Showing posts with label Stars. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stars. Show all posts
Monday, March 03, 2014
DallasStars.com: Tough Guy, Mike Modano
This is a week where everything that could be said about Mike Modano will be said twice. It is deserved and so is anything else that is offered in tribute for the good times he gave us all who were lucky enough to see him play hundreds of games.
He was the best. No doubt about it.
I won't attempt to say things that others have said because they have done it quite well. He is amongst the greatest to play the game, whether you want to talk about American hockey players, Dallas Stars, or just human beings. He was that good.
There is no question the principle memory I retain from watching Mike Modano was absolutely being struck by the speed of the man. In a sport where these warriors are routinely blurs across the ice, he was even faster. I have no idea if he had is jersey tailored differently for it to resemble a cape following him in his path - and if he did, that would be extremely vain - but between the hair, the jersey, the puck skills, and yes, the amazing speed, I can absolutely imagine what watching Bobby Hull must have been like. Because, surely, we got to see a version of that greatness night after night in Dallas.
The speed has been discussed at great length, and so have the scoring mitts, the depth of his determination to climb to a title, and his disgust for losing. Anyone who thought he was ok with losing never watched him take a shift. He didn't hide his anger on the ice and his level of frustration could bubble over right before your eyes.
But, if I may contribute to things you read about as we honor #9 by making sure nobody ever wears that number again for this franchise, I would like to dig a bit deeper and bring up something that the surface-level sports fan may never recall. If you watched him night after night, you knew that those that were sure he was some "pretty boy" had it all wrong.
Mike Modano was a tough guy. One of the toughest. No, not a fighter. Just tough as nails and not a guy who would back down to your efforts to punish him physically and scare him away. He would not be intimidated and he would not back down.
Mike Modano was absolutely one of the toughest son-of-a-guns that I have ever seen. And I am not talking about one particular piece of anecdotal information. No, sir. I am talking about over the course of his career, Modano was constantly hit so hard that on several occasions, we all wondered as he laid on the ice whether that was the "big one" that would take him out of action for a long, long time.
You likely already know what I am talking about. If not, a rather quick review of youtube can help you relive events that you might not wish to experience the first time. Mark Messier perhaps had the most famous blindside, cheap shot of Modano - albeit in a time in the National Hockey League where we actually had the audacity to blame the player who was hit for not "having his head on a swivel" even though Modano was finding the puck when Messier tried to decapitate him. It was a scary moment to say the least that was, of course, compounded by the fact that the medics on the scene dumped the stretcher he was on as they were trying to load it into the ambulance.
It was back when targeting the head was not forbidden and we weren't willing to accept that the human head could not take absurd levels of punishment. Messier was not even penalized, let alone suspended, but the damage was done. Mike was able to bounce back in that way that he would, but anyone that thinks the league has gone too far to take the physicality out of the game needs to review the play. Absolutely one of the most frightening moments ever.
And yet, Mike did not change his game. He played with speed and passion, battling for the puck at top velocity, and hunting for pucks at the same rate as ever before. If you want reality, the reality is that professional athletes change the way they play when they are physically punished. It is human. It could even be argued that it is smart. But, to change would be to surrender. And that wasn't Mike Modano.
So, fast forward a few years to 1999. The year the Cup was one was a year in which Modano found an even higher gear of two-way play that led the roster to its biggest achievement ever. That leadership should never be over-looked as Ken Hitchcock knew that if Modano would buy in to the complete team-game, so would the entire roster. He did, and they did.
Along the way, the physical toll would not be missed again. Jeremy Roenick of Phoenix decked Modano on another blindside, cheap play by the glass in the desert, which ended up starting the feud (or continuing it, at least) that would result in Derian Hatcher's moment of revenge and subsequent 7-game suspension that would start the 1999 playoffs in an odd fashion. Surely, if we were to add them up, Roenick got the worst end of that deal, but Modano was once again laying on the ice in a heap. And yet, upon his return, he kept playing at the same speed with the same abandon.
The Stars did, of course, win the Stanley Cup that summer, and only a few months later, it happened yet again. Now, I want to be clear, these are not normal hits or incidents. Nor, are they hits that you see on a regular basis. No, these 3 incidents I tell you about are all "once in a career" moments that had they gone just a little differently, his career would have not extended beyond these moments.
This one, on the 2nd night of the 1999-00 season was when he took a shot against Anaheim, and while his momentum took him off balance past the goal-line, defensemen Ruslan Salei pushed him towards the boards. The push sent him dangerously into the boards at an angle that put so much stress on his neck as it snapped back that it is still a wonder that he did not suffer a significant neck injury. In fact, players have been paralyzed at levels of hockey on plays that looked less intense, and as Mike's neck torqued in a way it shouldn't, he once again was motionless in a heap on the ice.
Somehow, with chaos all around him, including Darryl Sydor defending him on the spot, Mike was able to get off the ice and he returned to the ice 10 days later. It was really incredible he wasn't lost for much, much longer.
I feel this doesn't get discussed often enough. There is no question that injuries are random in both their occurrence and severity, and some guys just have luck smile on them and that allows them to continue to do what they do for a living. Then, some get out of the sport while they can and others change the way they play in a very understandable "business decision" to play slower and thus preserve their health and well-being.
It is certainly odd, then, for those of us who have never taken a shift or sustained a hit to evaluate the relative courage of these warriors, but guys like Mike (or Stephane Robidas) who take the hits they take and do not change a thing are guys I really admire. They only know how to play one way, and they don't want to cheat the game by not giving everything they have. If they do give it all, punishment will be waiting, but they put it all on the line.
I know this is a rough topic, because these stories can go wrong for a guy who wants to gamble with their health one time too many. It happens and then we don't know what to say about these sports we love and the men who play them and risk their health and well-being.
Mike played at one speed. It was amazing to watch. It also put him in harm's way on several brutal occasions. And yet, he didn't change. Is it courage? Is it crazy? Is it intelligent?
Honestly, it is tough to fully define. But, every time you paid to watch Mike Modano play, he wanted you to leave knowing you got your money's worth. There was never a question of his commitment and his knowledge that this might be the only time you ever get to watch him play live and he wanted you to remember it.
His body allowed him amazing talents and amazing durability. He then had to work hard to make that all develop into one of the greats of all-time. But, it also required huge amounts of courage and resolve to make it happen. We don't always appreciate what these guys risk to make us smile. But, with Mike, his scariest moments are on youtube anytime you want to see for yourself.
Those 3 incidents above were the biggest 3 I can recall. But there were many more, and he likely feels the aches to this day and for the rest of his life. Only these guys know if it was all worth it, for the money, the wins, and the legacy.
But, as a fan, I really appreciated him digging as deep as he did. He was one of a kind.
Thanks for being as tough as nails, Mike.
Labels:
Dallasstars.com,
Mike Modano,
Stars
Saturday, June 15, 2013
Email Bag For Father's Day Weekend
I have been asked to show a little more diversity on occasion when rolling out email bags. It seems, according to some, I respond to too many Cowboys-based emails, and far too few of any other sort of variety. So, as proof that I give into demands made of me on a regular basis, here are several emails - with none of them being Cowboys-based. Instead, we will make sure that we will touch all other Metroplex professional teams (within reason).
Here we go:
Bob- I consider myself a big Rangers fan who is starting to wonder if this team has just coming back to earth from the great start and playing more like a team that lost a number of key parts last winter without adding much. Is this a little closer to the Rangers that conventional wisdom thought back in February? - Shawn
Great question to get us started. I have to admit that I was one of those who really was bearish on the Rangers ability to play pennant-caliber baseball after saying goodbye to a large portion of their spine in Mike Young, Mike Napoli, Josh Hamilton, and a number of pieces in the bullpen all in the same winter. Then, their acquisitions seemed a bit on the hopeful side trying to squeeze a bit more out of the careers of Lance Berkman and AJ Pierzynski and beyond that, pretty much just trusting those around them to step up and do more. Not to mention, the looming discomfort of knowing Nelson Cruz could disappear for 2 months if this Biogenesis thing ever got serious which still threatens.
But, they got out of the gate with fantastic momentum and finished April 17-8, quieting any discussion of falling off and having a year with some regrouping necessary. Guys were stepping up, and the future was bright with a rotation that looked formidable and of course, the exciting news of Profar being around the next corner.
Then, injuries have hit. I would argue injuries have hit hard, with Matt Harrison, Alexi Ogando, and Martin Perez all going down with arm issues. This has transitioned us to now, Justin Grimm and Nick Tepesch have been starting for so many turns in the rotation that it doesn't even seem that they aren't regulars anymore. But, Grimm, in particular seems that the major leagues are catching up with him quickly. It appears clear that they need rotation help soon, and while it could come in the form of getting guys back - including Colby Lewis - we should also understand that deals might need to happen soon to address that.
Meanwhile, it has been a month without Ian Kinsler and now 10 days without Mitch Moreland where the wheels have really come off the offense. After another solid month in May (17-11), the beat up Rangers have just not been the same team in June, having now lost their first 3 series of the month to Boston, Toronto, and Cleveland. Off to a 4-8 start as of the morning of June 15 means they will have to skate hard to keep from having their first losing month of the campaign.
So, is it all a manner of health and sample sizes that are routine downslides in a 162-game season? Or, is part of this that the squad lost quite a bit of veteran pieces over the winter that need to be replenished in addition to returning to health? Clearly, you will trust the judgement of the management team and allow them to make their decisions based on their track record of having a proper feel for the situation. Oakland does have a 2 game lead, but there appears to be no other team in the race in the AL West who can get back in this.
I expect movement soon, in an effort to fix the rotation issues, but beyond that, I think any sort of panic is likely not trusting these guys - once Kinsler is back - to be able to start producing runs on a more regular basis than you are seeing. It just looks pretty disjointed at the moment.
Hey Bob, give me your Stars summer wish list? David
I am happy to answer this, but I am sure I will disappoint with my answers. If I read some supposed insider or expert on a topic like this one, I want answers with specifics. But, I have almost none for you. The free agent list - at the 2 primary positions of need for the Stars, center and defensemen - is so shallow and picked over that you are not going to want to do much there. In fact, on some level of twisted comedy, you might be amused to know that 2 of the top 5 centers available, are most likely Derek Roy and Mike Ribeiro. How crazy is that? The 2 guys that you considered not be the answer for you at center are now the 2 pretty girls that everyone will be bidding on in July against the entire league? That is just not going to solve anything here.
Meanwhile, the other spot of need is that big, physical, and versatile defensemen that can add some Duncan Keith/Zdeno Chara type fear to the group. Again, that defensemen is not on the free agent market this year - or pretty much ever.
So, you have money, you have resources, and you have a front office that wants to "wow" the public with rebuilding a franchise that refuses to fade without a battle. What are the plans? The plans are to make sure there are no big mistakes made. Slow build. Tons of picks. Stock that system even more full with 18-year olds who might be the next Jamie Benn or Brenden Dillon. Can't have enough of either of them, so keep growing your own. That requires patience and a fan-base with a stomach for it.
But, I don't expect that this will be the entire plan. I really think that this year, the Stars will be on the prowl to find those buy-out guys and even take on someone else's contract burden. The trouble is, given how little we know how Jim Nill values characteristics and types of hockey, I have no idea what the apple of his eye will be until he gives us hints. And so far, the Sergei Gonchar hint is not helping me see his vision, yet. Except, that the redundancy on his blue-line seems to indicate that a team that needs a competent defensemen can consider Trevor Daley or Stephane Robidas as part of a deal that might net the Stars a center that they covet. Bottom line, lots of moving parts.
I expect an active summer, but I can't shine much light on specific targets. Let's just hope that the target wasn't born before 1980 if we can help it.
Sports Sturm- Look, I know you realize FC Dallas is the top team in MLS right now. I know you did a bunch of their games on TV this year. I know you love soccer. I know you go to their matches. What exactly would it take for you to actually write or talk about them once in a while? Kevin
I take the blame for this. He is right. I don't miss many of their matches (despite their having one of the more frustrating tv deals in sports history right now) and they are playing fantastic. No team in the entire league has more points than FC Dallas and you can't say that it is early anymore. Bottom line, as we reach the halfway point of the season, is that they are good and they are being ignored.
For the media that doesn't follow the sport, that is to be expected. But, I can do better. I am really hopeful they can keep up what they have done so far, and I think a big part is to find another player in the back 4 to fortify a thin defense. They have quality 1-4, but one injury gives me pause that the hot summer might show that they will start conceding crucial goals against. If there has been one particular item of concern, it is closing down games late in the match. Figuring out how to park the bus in front of the goal and not concede is going to test their mettle down the stretch. Offensively, FCD has plenty of goal scoring with Blas Perez, Kenny Cooper, and a host of speed to get on the end of David Ferreira's genius and now the left foot of Michel.
I think they have finally hit on a quality team that was put together in the offseason under the radar when they lost Brek Shea, but gained 3-4 players with his funds. I think they are good, now we just need to figure out how good. Long ways to go, but a fantastic start.
Bob, please tell me Chris Paul and Dwight Howard are coming to the Mavericks. Please! I beg of you! Make it happen! Theon Greyjoy
I don't think that is really you, Theon. But, if it is, nobody deserves good news right now more than you do.
Anyway, I think Chris Paul coming here is the absolute maximum score for any activity this summer by Mark Cuban and friends. This team lacks a star of the proper age, a point guard of proper quality, and hope for the post-Dirk era. Chris and Cliff Paul would provide all of that in the form of one spectacular player. But, is it realistic?
Of course, it barely is. The Mavericks are staying ready and if it is true that D12 and CP3 want to play together, then there are a number of things that make that financially difficult to do it with Dirk still on his monster deal. They would have to take less and the Mavs would have to make a number of creative maneuvers to pull it off - all while there are other places that might be better equipped to do it.
But, Cuban seems determined. I don't know if that is his big splash, but he knows that he cannot have another Chris Kaman/Elton Brand/Darren Collison summer.
All is quiet on the Mavericks front, but we are down to about 2 weeks before operation powder is put into action. I hate to get my hopes up, but this one is all about getting Dirk a good team before it is too late. One final run for the big German might depend on how Cuban can work his magic in the next month.
And, I am told that he has put Shark Tank on notice about is schedule this time.
Good. Very good.
Here we go:
Bob- I consider myself a big Rangers fan who is starting to wonder if this team has just coming back to earth from the great start and playing more like a team that lost a number of key parts last winter without adding much. Is this a little closer to the Rangers that conventional wisdom thought back in February? - Shawn
Great question to get us started. I have to admit that I was one of those who really was bearish on the Rangers ability to play pennant-caliber baseball after saying goodbye to a large portion of their spine in Mike Young, Mike Napoli, Josh Hamilton, and a number of pieces in the bullpen all in the same winter. Then, their acquisitions seemed a bit on the hopeful side trying to squeeze a bit more out of the careers of Lance Berkman and AJ Pierzynski and beyond that, pretty much just trusting those around them to step up and do more. Not to mention, the looming discomfort of knowing Nelson Cruz could disappear for 2 months if this Biogenesis thing ever got serious which still threatens.
But, they got out of the gate with fantastic momentum and finished April 17-8, quieting any discussion of falling off and having a year with some regrouping necessary. Guys were stepping up, and the future was bright with a rotation that looked formidable and of course, the exciting news of Profar being around the next corner.
Then, injuries have hit. I would argue injuries have hit hard, with Matt Harrison, Alexi Ogando, and Martin Perez all going down with arm issues. This has transitioned us to now, Justin Grimm and Nick Tepesch have been starting for so many turns in the rotation that it doesn't even seem that they aren't regulars anymore. But, Grimm, in particular seems that the major leagues are catching up with him quickly. It appears clear that they need rotation help soon, and while it could come in the form of getting guys back - including Colby Lewis - we should also understand that deals might need to happen soon to address that.
Meanwhile, it has been a month without Ian Kinsler and now 10 days without Mitch Moreland where the wheels have really come off the offense. After another solid month in May (17-11), the beat up Rangers have just not been the same team in June, having now lost their first 3 series of the month to Boston, Toronto, and Cleveland. Off to a 4-8 start as of the morning of June 15 means they will have to skate hard to keep from having their first losing month of the campaign.
So, is it all a manner of health and sample sizes that are routine downslides in a 162-game season? Or, is part of this that the squad lost quite a bit of veteran pieces over the winter that need to be replenished in addition to returning to health? Clearly, you will trust the judgement of the management team and allow them to make their decisions based on their track record of having a proper feel for the situation. Oakland does have a 2 game lead, but there appears to be no other team in the race in the AL West who can get back in this.
I expect movement soon, in an effort to fix the rotation issues, but beyond that, I think any sort of panic is likely not trusting these guys - once Kinsler is back - to be able to start producing runs on a more regular basis than you are seeing. It just looks pretty disjointed at the moment.
Hey Bob, give me your Stars summer wish list? David
I am happy to answer this, but I am sure I will disappoint with my answers. If I read some supposed insider or expert on a topic like this one, I want answers with specifics. But, I have almost none for you. The free agent list - at the 2 primary positions of need for the Stars, center and defensemen - is so shallow and picked over that you are not going to want to do much there. In fact, on some level of twisted comedy, you might be amused to know that 2 of the top 5 centers available, are most likely Derek Roy and Mike Ribeiro. How crazy is that? The 2 guys that you considered not be the answer for you at center are now the 2 pretty girls that everyone will be bidding on in July against the entire league? That is just not going to solve anything here.
Meanwhile, the other spot of need is that big, physical, and versatile defensemen that can add some Duncan Keith/Zdeno Chara type fear to the group. Again, that defensemen is not on the free agent market this year - or pretty much ever.
So, you have money, you have resources, and you have a front office that wants to "wow" the public with rebuilding a franchise that refuses to fade without a battle. What are the plans? The plans are to make sure there are no big mistakes made. Slow build. Tons of picks. Stock that system even more full with 18-year olds who might be the next Jamie Benn or Brenden Dillon. Can't have enough of either of them, so keep growing your own. That requires patience and a fan-base with a stomach for it.
But, I don't expect that this will be the entire plan. I really think that this year, the Stars will be on the prowl to find those buy-out guys and even take on someone else's contract burden. The trouble is, given how little we know how Jim Nill values characteristics and types of hockey, I have no idea what the apple of his eye will be until he gives us hints. And so far, the Sergei Gonchar hint is not helping me see his vision, yet. Except, that the redundancy on his blue-line seems to indicate that a team that needs a competent defensemen can consider Trevor Daley or Stephane Robidas as part of a deal that might net the Stars a center that they covet. Bottom line, lots of moving parts.
I expect an active summer, but I can't shine much light on specific targets. Let's just hope that the target wasn't born before 1980 if we can help it.
Sports Sturm- Look, I know you realize FC Dallas is the top team in MLS right now. I know you did a bunch of their games on TV this year. I know you love soccer. I know you go to their matches. What exactly would it take for you to actually write or talk about them once in a while? Kevin
I take the blame for this. He is right. I don't miss many of their matches (despite their having one of the more frustrating tv deals in sports history right now) and they are playing fantastic. No team in the entire league has more points than FC Dallas and you can't say that it is early anymore. Bottom line, as we reach the halfway point of the season, is that they are good and they are being ignored.
For the media that doesn't follow the sport, that is to be expected. But, I can do better. I am really hopeful they can keep up what they have done so far, and I think a big part is to find another player in the back 4 to fortify a thin defense. They have quality 1-4, but one injury gives me pause that the hot summer might show that they will start conceding crucial goals against. If there has been one particular item of concern, it is closing down games late in the match. Figuring out how to park the bus in front of the goal and not concede is going to test their mettle down the stretch. Offensively, FCD has plenty of goal scoring with Blas Perez, Kenny Cooper, and a host of speed to get on the end of David Ferreira's genius and now the left foot of Michel.
I think they have finally hit on a quality team that was put together in the offseason under the radar when they lost Brek Shea, but gained 3-4 players with his funds. I think they are good, now we just need to figure out how good. Long ways to go, but a fantastic start.
Bob, please tell me Chris Paul and Dwight Howard are coming to the Mavericks. Please! I beg of you! Make it happen! Theon Greyjoy
I don't think that is really you, Theon. But, if it is, nobody deserves good news right now more than you do.
Anyway, I think Chris Paul coming here is the absolute maximum score for any activity this summer by Mark Cuban and friends. This team lacks a star of the proper age, a point guard of proper quality, and hope for the post-Dirk era. Chris and Cliff Paul would provide all of that in the form of one spectacular player. But, is it realistic?
Of course, it barely is. The Mavericks are staying ready and if it is true that D12 and CP3 want to play together, then there are a number of things that make that financially difficult to do it with Dirk still on his monster deal. They would have to take less and the Mavs would have to make a number of creative maneuvers to pull it off - all while there are other places that might be better equipped to do it.
But, Cuban seems determined. I don't know if that is his big splash, but he knows that he cannot have another Chris Kaman/Elton Brand/Darren Collison summer.
All is quiet on the Mavericks front, but we are down to about 2 weeks before operation powder is put into action. I hate to get my hopes up, but this one is all about getting Dirk a good team before it is too late. One final run for the big German might depend on how Cuban can work his magic in the next month.
And, I am told that he has put Shark Tank on notice about is schedule this time.
Good. Very good.
Thursday, March 07, 2013
Worst Years EVER
This post is a bit of an update on something we talked about in this space about 5 years ago (granted, this space has changed title sponsors about 3 times since then - Thanks, Fox Sports Southwest for their continued employment).
I have always had the theory that cities like ours, as opposed to the "one-horse towns" do not experience prolonged depression and mourning when our teams fail...we just move on to the next one. The Mavs make us sad? Its' Rangers season! The Rangers are fading? Hello, Cowboys Camp! And so on, and so on...
Conversely, in San Antonio, for instance, when the Spurs fail, it is time for Spurs off-season mourning. That is a totally different way of sports way of life. Much like the way the folks in England live life with their soccer teams. They care about one team and one team only. The victories are higher, but the failures - of which there are many - are much more profoundly painful.
Admirable in some ways, maddening in others. Anyway, here is Trey's question.
Could 2013 be the worst year in the history of this 4-sport town?
This kind of reminds me of a book I once enjoyed, True Believers by Joe Queenan, where he claimed sports was one big shell-game of hope. They put enough franchises in each city that invariably, one will capture our imagination and keep us locked into the industry while the others are allowed to exist until they figure something out. We are never able to walk away because while 3 screw around, one is always bound to be at least good enough to keep us.
Anyway, below is what my newest chart looks like dating back to 1994, the first year we were officially a 4-horse town:
After accounting for each year, and changing the math to not penalize the Stars and Rangers for each sport canceling its championship one year, here are the findings.
On a sport by sport basis, we can see that the Stars are going through their worst run in Dallas by a mile. So much so that after playing their first 15 years with 13 playoff berths, they are now on the verge of going 5 straight unless they can get in this spring. That is still doable.
The Mavericks are 2nd, after digging a huge hole in the 1990s, they haven't missed since Dave Campo's 1st year in office.
The Cowboys are the Cowboys, and now having gone 3 seasons without the playoffs are technically in the exact same place they were after the 3 missed seasons with Campo. That hurts.
And the Rangers have hit 3 playoffs in a row (although 2012 is a bit of a wildcard technicality - in any other year before 2012, that is not the playoffs. But, with the "expanded Wildcard format" we must concede that what used to be a play-in game is now a play-off games) and try to keep their good fortune going this season.
So, no years where all 4 teams missed the playoffs, but some less than stellar years were mixed in, including 3 years where 3 of the 4 teams missed. They are below with painful videos provided by youtube:
1997 - A year in which the Cowboys, Mavericks, and Rangers all missed. This was a particularly rare performance from the Cowboys who made the playoffs every other year from 1991 to 1999. The Rangers missed for the only year between 1996-1999. The Mavericks never went once in the 1990's, and the Stars, who were the only team to make the playoffs, were kicked out promptly on the Todd Marchant goal in Game 7's overtime. Below, find the painful evidence.
2000 - This year is tough to call a "down" year, given that the Stars were in the Stanley Cup Finals (Stinking Jason Arnott). But, the Mavs were in year 1 of the Cuban experiment (Best remembered as the Dennis Rodman year, even if he only did play 12 memorable games). The Cowboys were in year 1 of the Campo era, and the Rangers traded Juan Gonzalez after the 1999 playoff year and dropped 24 games in the standings. Below, find the quietest moment in Reunion Arena hockey history (provided the Marchant goal above wasn't):
2002 - This year saw the Stars with a rare playoff miss (Goodbye, Ken Hitchcock); A somewhat ordinary Cowboys playoff miss (Goodbye, Dave Campo); and, another miss of the playoffs by the Rangers (Hello, Jerry Narron. Goodbye, Jerry Narron). But, the new darling of the metro-plex, those Dallas Mavericks were in. After sweeping the Timberwolves, despite Chauncey Billups and Kevin Garnett doing well, the Mavs hit the buzzsaw that was the Sacramento Kings. The Mavs split in No-Cal in the first two games, before losing both games in Dallas and then dropping Game 5 back at Arco to fall to the Kings, 4 games to 1. You may recall that 2002 was the year the Kings seemed to have the best team in the league (they had the best record), but dropped a very hotly contested 7 game war with the Lakers in the Western Finals. If you can handle the upset stomach, below see the Game 4 winner from Mike Bibby as he put the Mavs to the sword:
2005 - This year, the rather non-descript Rangers put 4 all-stars in the mid-summer classic but finished under .500 yet again, the Cowboys lost 4 of 6 on the way in and missed the playoffs in Drew Bledsoe's 1 full year under center, and the NHL decided the best way to fix their sport was to basically try to murder it in cold blood.
Meanwhile, the Mavericks had a crazy 2005 season, which started the summer before by letting Steve Nash get away. This brought in young Devin Harris and Jason Terry to try to sort out the point guard situation that never was fully sorted. To make matters crazier, they opened with the Houston Rockets in the playoffs and quickly lost both games 1 and 2 at home. Then, they stormed back with a giant win in Game 7 by blowing out the Rockets by 40, 116-76. From there, they were reunited with Nash in the 2nd round of the playoffs and gutted in Game 6 by Nash and friends in Dallas. This game is known for many moments, most of which can be seen below:
So, in 19 years, only 4 have had happened where only 1 team went to the post-season. Of those, 2000 was a Stanley Cup Finals and 2002 and 2005 at least had a series win for the one team to get through.
That leaves 1997 as the year to beat for worst year ever in DFW's 4-team era.
2013, though, should not be underestimated. The Mavs look lost, the Stars are borderline, the Rangers appear to have taken a step back, and the Cowboys are anyone's guess.
Could this be the first year everyone is out? At this moment, it remains a story worth tracking for sure.
I have always had the theory that cities like ours, as opposed to the "one-horse towns" do not experience prolonged depression and mourning when our teams fail...we just move on to the next one. The Mavs make us sad? Its' Rangers season! The Rangers are fading? Hello, Cowboys Camp! And so on, and so on...
Conversely, in San Antonio, for instance, when the Spurs fail, it is time for Spurs off-season mourning. That is a totally different way of sports way of life. Much like the way the folks in England live life with their soccer teams. They care about one team and one team only. The victories are higher, but the failures - of which there are many - are much more profoundly painful.
Admirable in some ways, maddening in others. Anyway, here is Trey's question.
Bob,
With the Mavs struggling coming down the stretch I started thinking about all the major Dallas sports teams missing the playoffs in the same year. Obviously we are used to seeing this from the Rangers and the Mavs had that awful stretch in the 90’s but I couldn’t find a year where this has happened since the Stars came to town in ’93. However, I’ll admit my research was quick and not that thorough. Also, with the way the sports calendar wraps around from year to year I kinda got tired-head looking at it. I was wondering if you had any better insight on this in your sports brain...
Sincerely,
Trey
Could 2013 be the worst year in the history of this 4-sport town?
This kind of reminds me of a book I once enjoyed, True Believers by Joe Queenan, where he claimed sports was one big shell-game of hope. They put enough franchises in each city that invariably, one will capture our imagination and keep us locked into the industry while the others are allowed to exist until they figure something out. We are never able to walk away because while 3 screw around, one is always bound to be at least good enough to keep us.
Anyway, below is what my newest chart looks like dating back to 1994, the first year we were officially a 4-horse town:
| Year | Cowboys | Stars | Mavericks | Rangers |
| 1994 | NFC Champ | 2nd Round | Missed | NO PLAYOFFS |
| 1995 | NFL Champions | 1st Round | Missed | Missed |
| 1996 | 2nd Round | Missed | Missed | 1st Round |
| 1997 | Missed | 1st Round | Missed | Missed |
| 1998 | 1st Round | 3rd Round | Missed | 1st Round |
| 1999 | 1st Round | NHL Champions | Missed | 1st Round |
| 2000 | Missed | Lost in Finals | Missed | Missed |
| 2001 | Missed | 2nd Round | 2nd Round | Missed |
| 2002 | Missed | Missed | 2nd Round | Missed |
| 2003 | 1st Round | 2nd Round | 3rd Round | Missed |
| 2004 | Missed | 1st Round | 1st Round | Missed |
| 2005 | Missed | NO SEASON | 2nd Round | Missed |
| 2006 | 1st Round | 1st Round | Lost in Finals | Missed |
| 2007 | 1st Round | 1st Round | 1st Round | Missed |
| 2008 | Missed | 3rd Round | 1st Round | Missed |
| 2009 | 2nd Round | Missed | 2nd Round | Missed |
| 2010 | Missed | Missed | 1st Round | Lost in W Series |
| 2011 | Missed | Missed | NBA Champions | Lost in W Series |
| 2012 | Missed | Missed | 1st Round | Wildcard |
| 2013 | ||||
| Totals | 9 of 19 | 13 of 18 | 12 of 19 | 6 of 18 |
After accounting for each year, and changing the math to not penalize the Stars and Rangers for each sport canceling its championship one year, here are the findings.
On a sport by sport basis, we can see that the Stars are going through their worst run in Dallas by a mile. So much so that after playing their first 15 years with 13 playoff berths, they are now on the verge of going 5 straight unless they can get in this spring. That is still doable.
The Mavericks are 2nd, after digging a huge hole in the 1990s, they haven't missed since Dave Campo's 1st year in office.
The Cowboys are the Cowboys, and now having gone 3 seasons without the playoffs are technically in the exact same place they were after the 3 missed seasons with Campo. That hurts.
And the Rangers have hit 3 playoffs in a row (although 2012 is a bit of a wildcard technicality - in any other year before 2012, that is not the playoffs. But, with the "expanded Wildcard format" we must concede that what used to be a play-in game is now a play-off games) and try to keep their good fortune going this season.
So, no years where all 4 teams missed the playoffs, but some less than stellar years were mixed in, including 3 years where 3 of the 4 teams missed. They are below with painful videos provided by youtube:
1997 - A year in which the Cowboys, Mavericks, and Rangers all missed. This was a particularly rare performance from the Cowboys who made the playoffs every other year from 1991 to 1999. The Rangers missed for the only year between 1996-1999. The Mavericks never went once in the 1990's, and the Stars, who were the only team to make the playoffs, were kicked out promptly on the Todd Marchant goal in Game 7's overtime. Below, find the painful evidence.
2000 - This year is tough to call a "down" year, given that the Stars were in the Stanley Cup Finals (Stinking Jason Arnott). But, the Mavs were in year 1 of the Cuban experiment (Best remembered as the Dennis Rodman year, even if he only did play 12 memorable games). The Cowboys were in year 1 of the Campo era, and the Rangers traded Juan Gonzalez after the 1999 playoff year and dropped 24 games in the standings. Below, find the quietest moment in Reunion Arena hockey history (provided the Marchant goal above wasn't):
2002 - This year saw the Stars with a rare playoff miss (Goodbye, Ken Hitchcock); A somewhat ordinary Cowboys playoff miss (Goodbye, Dave Campo); and, another miss of the playoffs by the Rangers (Hello, Jerry Narron. Goodbye, Jerry Narron). But, the new darling of the metro-plex, those Dallas Mavericks were in. After sweeping the Timberwolves, despite Chauncey Billups and Kevin Garnett doing well, the Mavs hit the buzzsaw that was the Sacramento Kings. The Mavs split in No-Cal in the first two games, before losing both games in Dallas and then dropping Game 5 back at Arco to fall to the Kings, 4 games to 1. You may recall that 2002 was the year the Kings seemed to have the best team in the league (they had the best record), but dropped a very hotly contested 7 game war with the Lakers in the Western Finals. If you can handle the upset stomach, below see the Game 4 winner from Mike Bibby as he put the Mavs to the sword:
2005 - This year, the rather non-descript Rangers put 4 all-stars in the mid-summer classic but finished under .500 yet again, the Cowboys lost 4 of 6 on the way in and missed the playoffs in Drew Bledsoe's 1 full year under center, and the NHL decided the best way to fix their sport was to basically try to murder it in cold blood.
Meanwhile, the Mavericks had a crazy 2005 season, which started the summer before by letting Steve Nash get away. This brought in young Devin Harris and Jason Terry to try to sort out the point guard situation that never was fully sorted. To make matters crazier, they opened with the Houston Rockets in the playoffs and quickly lost both games 1 and 2 at home. Then, they stormed back with a giant win in Game 7 by blowing out the Rockets by 40, 116-76. From there, they were reunited with Nash in the 2nd round of the playoffs and gutted in Game 6 by Nash and friends in Dallas. This game is known for many moments, most of which can be seen below:
So, in 19 years, only 4 have had happened where only 1 team went to the post-season. Of those, 2000 was a Stanley Cup Finals and 2002 and 2005 at least had a series win for the one team to get through.
That leaves 1997 as the year to beat for worst year ever in DFW's 4-team era.
2013, though, should not be underestimated. The Mavs look lost, the Stars are borderline, the Rangers appear to have taken a step back, and the Cowboys are anyone's guess.
Could this be the first year everyone is out? At this moment, it remains a story worth tracking for sure.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
