Monday, September 20, 2010

The Morning After: Chicago 27, Dallas 20

As seen here: http://cowboysblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2010/09/bob-sturm-cowboys-had-second-b.html


One of the many reasons why the NFL is the most popular league in the US is that the sport is absolutely impossible to predict. The drama from week to week shows us anything is possible and that nothing is assured. We love that feeling about "Any Given Sunday" until the chickens come home to roost with our favorite team.

And after only 2 weekends of NFL action, the Dallas Cowboys appear to be in a full-fledged crisis. How did this happen so quickly? Who is to blame? And, is there any way back?

Read on.

The reasons for winning and losing every Sunday are unfairly simplified by most observers down to coaching and QB play. I say it is unfair because the game of football requires such a synchronized team effort, with so many departments doing their job properly, that to boil it down to only a few members of the team seems awfully simplistic.

But, boy, is it obvious when you have the 2nd best Quarterback on the field on the day. And Sunday, as the Bears were demoralizing the Cowboys in their own stadium in a game where most felt pretty assured that the Cowboys would eventually prevail, Jay Cutler played as substantially better than Tony Romo. And with no running game to speak of and no big plays from the defense, the Cowboys cannot weather too many occasions where their QB is not the best at his position on a given day.

Romo did not help his cause yesterday, despite what his 374 yards will tell fantasy football owners. His sharpness was not there, and I couldn't help but recall that early in 2009, Romo spent a good portion of September looking rather "off". His QB ratings last year by month, were: 85.2 in Sept, 102.8 in Oct, 93 in Nov, and 104 in Dec. Once he worked his way into form, he was an elite QB, but it took a few weeks, and the Cowboys were 2-2 before they started playing well. It is enough to make you wonder about the way this team handles training camp, doesn't it?

While there are plenty of reasons why the Cowboys lost to the Bears, if Romo matches Cutler's play, I believe Dallas wins this game. But, let's look some of the key throws of the game from a Dallas perspective:

1) - 3/10/C46 - Romo has the team driving with 1:49 left in the half, down 17-14. On 2nd down, Miles Austin had a rare drop so it is still 3rd and long. Cowboys are in S12 (Shotgun, 1RB, 2TE, 2WR), and the Bears counter with press coverage on Austin and Roy Williams out wide. This leaves Martellus Bennett and Jason Witten in routes to the middle of the field. Bennett is not open as a safety is shading him high on his vertical, so Romo makes the right read to Witten at the 1st Down marker. But, as Witten makes his break, Romo throws the ball behind him and Witten tries to reach back and make a play. This causes the ball to tip into the arms of DJ Moore for an easy interception. It was a poor throw, and despite it being a tight space to fit, Romo has made that throw accurately a thousand times. Just not yesterday.

2) - 3/8/C37 - Another nice long drive, down 20-17, comes down to this play in the 3rd Quarter, 3:30 left. Another 3rd and 8, and another look at S12 (Interesting how many times they ran S12 in crucial spots with Roy Williams in instead of Dez Bryant). Bears offer a 5 man blitz of "Fire Zone" variety, with Chris Harris the safety blitzing from Romo's left and Julius Peppers lined up over Marc Colombo, but Peppers runs with Witten into the secondary. Romo diagnoses and takes the slant up top to Williams, and the throw is behind him. This is a very tight squeeze, with a blitzer in your face, but if he makes the pass, the Cowboys get points. He doesn't make the pass, and it is punting time.

3) - 3/8/D33 - 12:53 left in game, down 20-17. Yet another 3rd and long, yet another try with S12. The reason I keep pointing this out is when the Bears see S12, they try to eliminate the two edge WRs with press coverage. They now know that the play is likely to be funneled to Jason Witten. This is partially due to the coverage, partially due to Romo and Witten have played pitch and catch on 3rd Down for years in Dallas. And partially due to the fact that nobody believes Romo will throw it to Bennett on a "money" down. Again, Lance Briggs is sitting on the 8 yard route. He knows what is coming, Witten tries to still make room, but it would have taken a perfect throw to the inside. The throw was not to the inside, and it was easily batted down by Briggs.

4) - 3/5/C26 - 7:36 left in game, still down 20-17. Witten is injured, so S12 is not an option - nor is Romo's 3rd Down target. Jason Garrett rolls with S11, and has a play design that is perfect. Trips to the left with Bennett, Williams, and Austin. Austin draws the high safety over to that side, too. This leaves Dez Bryant on the right by himself, pressed by Zack Bowman. A slant vacates the right side of the field for Tashard Choice running the wheel route down the sideline. Briggs has the assigment here, but is late getting there, and a proper lofted throw by Romo is a likely Touchdown. Briggs would likely not chase Choice down from behind. But the throw is early (may have thought a blitz was coming) and not lofted so even if Choice did catch it, he would have had to stop and may not even gain the first down. And, the Field Goal attempt that followed was missed.

4 big moments in the game. 4 big throws on 3rd Down from Tony Romo. And 4 drives stall at crucial junctures with a total of 0 points to show for it.

Anyone who reads me knows I think the Cowboys have a very good QB. And anyone who watches football knows every QB misses throws. But, on this day, it was which throws Tony missed that hurt this team. On 3rd Down, he was 5-10, 78 yards, an interception, and a dreadful 36.6 QB Rating.

Meanwhile, Jay Cutler is making throws at all the right moments and not coming close to turning the ball over. Despite a million other smaller reasons, to me, that is the biggest issue in a 27-20 home defeat to the Bears.

Here are some other random observations from the difficult day at Cowboys Stadium:

* From the Bears perspective, there are very few times a team gifts you a TD like the Cowboys did late in the 1Q on the Greg Olsen catch and run from 39 yards out. I have read plenty about how Alan Ball wasn't in the right place here, but I don't understand how anyone can make that claim. Trying to make an educated guess, this looks like Mike Martz out-schemed Wade Phillips on this one. The Bears spent the first 2 drives with Cutler under absolute siege, so to counter, Martz starts to order quick passes in the areas where the blitz is vacating. On this play, the Bears have "11" personnel, but the 1 RB, Chester Taylor is in the slot right. So, Devin Hester and Taylor matched up on the right with Terrence Newman and Ball. To the top, it is Johnny Knox and Earl Bennett with Mike Jenkins and Gerald Sensabaugh. 4 on 4 all the way. So, with Greg Olsen off Right Tackle, I am sure the Cowboys assume that he is helping that poor OL against the Cowboys rush. The Cowboys dial up a LB blitz, and it appears here that their "Olsen assumption" went horribly wrong. Olsen slipped out, caught the ball with nobody near him at the 34, and avoids Ball inside the 10 for a TD. People watch on TV and blame Ball, but there is no way he is supposed to cover Chester Taylor AND Greg Olsen. Somebody busted, and it is either Wade or one of his Linebackers or both.

* To further tip your cap to Martz and Cutler, although this one is hardly rocket science, the fade to Matt Forte when Michael Hamlin was inserted to deal with him was about as simple a TD as there can possibly be. From what I have seen when he has been given an opportunity, Hamlin seems a long ways away from being a reasonable option on the defense.

* I don't think it is unreasonable to wonder why the Cowboys are a) running the ball so rarely and b) running the ball so poorly. In the first two games, the Cowboys have had the ball on 1st and 10 66 different times. According to my notes, I see the ration as 46 pass/20 run. On 1st and 10, this is a shocking ratio for a team that has been so successful at running the ball. Even if you blame 24/10 in Washington on the OL, then how do we explain 22/10 with all 5 OL healthy? Now, it should be noted that of those 10 1st Down carries on Sunday, they averaged 1.7 yards a carry. So, Jason Garrett may wonder how many times he is supposed to set up 2nd and 9 with another 1 yard run. If you are trying something and it isn't working, then you sometimes move on. And, add to that the fact that there were more than a few OL penalties, and now we understand why the Cowboys were in 3rd and long too much again. In 2009, the Cowboys were 51% run on 1st Down. So, this 30% run ratio so far on 1st Down is very odd and perhaps tells us what they think of their "dominant OL".

* We properly pointed out Friday that Lance Briggs is an elite NFL LB. If I am a Bears fan, I am wondering why Tommie Harris still looks pretty easy to block, but with Peppers, Urlacher, and Briggs, I don't think it is crazy to think the Bears defense will keep them in plenty of games. And if that Cutler shows up every Sunday, they can move right into contention.

* The easiest way to determine the outcome of the game is to know the turnover margin. The Cowboys were a "-3" on Sunday, and to help you attach meaning to that, since the start of 2009, teams that finish a game "-3" or worse are 1-56 in the NFL. This is regardless of where you played the game, who you played, who was injured, and what plays were called. If you are -3, you lose.

* I expect that for the next week, Romo and Garrett will again be under the gun for not getting the job done. But, for this team to go anywhere, the defense needs to be held responsible. It is one thing to blow a coverage on a play or two. Those situations hurt, but that is football. But, when this "elite" defense consistently presents the offense with horrible field position, it makes the team look dysfunctional. No good team in this league has to travel further to score. That has nothing to do with play-calling or QB play except that it makes them do more work than their competition. Yesterday, the Bears were given a 64 yard field on average while the Cowboys had a 77 yard field. Starting Drive positions for Dallas yesterday: D25, D20, D27, D20, D20, D34, D13, D20, D31, D26 and D21. That is absurd. If this defense is as good as we say it is, they should do more than they do. They have to make a play once in a while.

* While on that topic, we should also point out that they way they started the game had us convinced that they were going to need a stretcher for the remains of Jay Cutler. They ended the game with 1 sack - just like last week. 1! And that 1 sack was with a blatant face-mask that was not called on Anthony Spencer. There are 2 teams in this league that already have 10 sacks each. But, once the Olsen TD happened, the Cowboys pass rush was effectively neutered. That cannot happen.

* Positives? Doug Free looked capable for the 2nd straight week (although he is part of that OL that cannot run the ball); Marcus Spears was called upon to allow the Cowboys a "23" package despite Deon Anderson and John Phillips being lost to injury. I look forward to the PA pass to Spears for a TD that is coming. Dez Bryant sure looks like the real deal - which makes you wonder why he only had 2 targets yesterday.

* 2 players you absolutely cannot lose to injury appear to have issues. Stay tuned for developments on Jason Witten and Mike Jenkins. Those losses would be very difficult to overcome.

* I know I have talked about this before, but the handling of the Cowboys kicking situation is beyond insane to me. For this organization to spend all of 2009 with Buehler kicking at practice and yet ignore him in December of '09 when they needed a kicker spoke volumes. They would rather call Shaun Suisham, who had missed crucial FGs at Cowboys Stadium just a few weeks prior, than use a guy they see every day when Nick Folk imploded. Then, after the season, they tell us Buehler is the chosen one and that they have all the faith in the world in him - so much so that he is largely unchallenged all off-season and training camp. So, what changed? You didn't believe in him in December, but you cannot question him in August? I am bewildered about that thought process, but not bewildered at all that he is starting the season shaky. Kicking in the NFL requires nerves of steel, and despite his kickoff prowess, he has admitted that he never kicked a FG in a game-deciding scenario at USC or the NFL until last week. It was a silly an unnecessary gamble for the Cowboys to take and it appears to be biting them in the rear end. But, in perfect Cowboys fashion, all of the quotes tell us they are determined to ride it out rather than admit they perhaps lost their gamble. All that does is further risk games they can no longer afford to lose. To say that I sometimes don't agree with this team in personnel matters would be a wild understatement.

The vultures are circling this week. 0-2 is not good, but it is not the end of the world. It appears the NFC East is not going to take 12 wins to win. We will soon see what kind of character the Cowboys have. We will see what their leadership is, and whether they actually have any. Does this team have a power structure that works for anyone besides the owner?

They have a very difficult game in 6 days. If they lose it, people will be calling for change. Trouble is, there is no time for change right now. This is the team that they have, and they will need to sort through this on their own or see everything they have worked for turn to garbage.

Today will be a day of Cowboys' soul searching.

Tomorrow: We break down another disappointing offensive effort with "Decoding Garrett"

Friday, September 17, 2010

Game Day Friday: Chicago Bears

As we roll through an NFL season, there are weeks where the two teams are on completely different mental planes. For instance, this week, the Cowboys have been kicked around and doubted as anyone would expect following a game in which they 1) lost the season opener 2) in prime time 3) to a division rival 4) in somewhat self-inflicted fashion.

Meanwhile, the Chicago Bears have meekly accepted their win over Detroit knowing that they likely did not quite deserve their "W" since it took the dubious ruling of a Calvin Johnson Touchdown catch to make it so. Nevertheless, the 1-0 Bears visit the 0-1 Cowboys in a game that Dallas knows it must have with an intimidating trip to Houston in one week's time.

The Bears are in a constant state of reconstruction it seems, but they are also the only NFC North team to make the Super Bowl (2006) since Green Bay in 1997. They have had some wonderful years under Lovie Smith, but as he enters year 6 of his run, he is clearly under the gun to produce or else. And he knows that since 3 former head coaches are his assistants (Mike Martz, Rod Marinelli, Mike Tice), it would take roughly 30 seconds for the Bears to find his successor.

The Bears have much of the core of their Super Bowl team, but as we know around here, familiar names may not mean that the team's quality is still there. The Cowboys of the late 1990's demonstrated how sometimes you can fall in love with names and not notice the diminishing skills that age brings. Brian Urlacher, Tommie Harris, Charles Tillman, Olin Kreutz, Robert Garza, and Lance Briggs are all core members of that team - but only Briggs is still thought of as an elite player in most NFL circles from that team.

But, the Bears did make a very impressive signing in the offseason, when they put $91.5 million dollars in front of Julius Peppers with $42 million guaranteed. There is little question that Peppers is an elite talent, and although his motor does not always run, it was certainly effective enough to rack up 25 sacks in the last 2 seasons when he was playing for a contract with the Carolina Panthers.

Lovie Smith believes in the Tampa-2, and that is completely based on the front 4 getting pressure so that the Linebackers may work with the Defensive Backs in a very tightly defensed secondary. Well, Peppers should aid Harris and friends in that regard. Curiously, they allowed Alex Brown to exit to New Orleans (not to mention Adewale Ogunleye), so we could make the case they still only have 1 threatening Defensive End.

But, make no mistake - theme #1 for the Chicago Bears this season is to figure out how to use Jay Cutler properly. They need him to match QB play with Aaron Rodgers and Brett Favre in the NFC North, and finally put to bed the crazy issues the Bears have had at the QB position for years.

This List shows the starting QBs for the Bears since the start of division rival - Brett Favre's career in Green Bay:


1992: Jim Harbaugh, Peter Tom Willis, Will Furrer
1993: Harbaugh, Willis
1994: Erik Kramer, Steve Walsh
1995: Kramer
1996: Kramer, Dave Kreig
1997: Kramer, Rick Mirer
1998: Kramer, Steve Stenstrom, Moses Moreno
1999: Shane Matthews, Cade McNown, Jim Miller
2000: McNown, Matthews, Miller
2001: Miller, Matthews
2002: Miller, Chris Chandler, Henry Burris
2003: Kordell Stewart, Chandler, Rex Grossman
2004: Grossman, Jonathan Quinn, Craig Krenzel, Chad Hutchinson
2005: Kyle Orton, Grossman
2006: Grossman
2007: Grossman, Brian Griese, Orton
2008: Orton, Grossman
2009: Jay Cutler


Simply amazing. I count 22 different.

ON OFFENSE:

Do you want to see the 1 thing that scares every coach and general manager in football more than anything? Here it is. 1 play where your franchise QB is not protected on the blindside and his shoulder is crushed because you didn't get one of the great pass rushers in this league blocked. Take a frightening look:



We are all critical of play calling. We all think we could do better. But, we must never forget that the season ends if Tony Romo is lost for the season. I just think it is important to remind people this week, where Jason Garrett is a being treated like a pinata. Now, I am not saying he doesn't deserve some level of critique (see below for that), but we had Deion Sanders on our show this week (And I also read the same ideas from Michael Irvin here at the DMN) and he suggested that they allow Romo to stay alive in the pocket and make plays with his feet so that he can throw downfield. I agree - to a point. And the point is when he gets "ear holed" from someone like Julius Peppers and is lost for 8 weeks. The trouble is that nobody knows what hit will knock their prized QB out for most of the year, so the only way to keep him upright is to protect him. And that is exactly why Jason Garrett was frustrating you with his quick passes in his game plan last week.

Understand that a play caller's goal is not to frustrate you. It is to move the ball down the field as effectively as possible without jeopardizing the players that win games for the Dallas Cowboys. It is a difficult balance, but the Lions now have to figure out what the "Shaun Hill" era will be like since Matthew Stafford will have his arm in a sling for more than a month.

Tough Lesson to learn the hard way.

OFFENSIVE OBJECTIVES:

1) - Simplify the Plan - I think Garrett gets ripped way too often for way too many reasons, but he is far from perfect (as every coach is). In 16 NFL Cities this week, the Offensive Coordinator is a clueless, incapable, empty suit. And you know what? Next week, there will be 16 more. If they lose, he obviously didn't call the right plays. HOWEVER, I do think there is a very fair criticism of Jason Garrett after charting his games for several years. I can't help but think that he tries to do too much with this offense. To notice that, I try to watch other teams around the league who have great success. For instance, I chart the Colts quite a bit, and feel that although they have a very complex offense, they seem to do much of their damage from 1 or 2 personnel groups. The Colts do almost everything from "11" personnel, and while they go back and forth with Peyton Manning between shotgun and under center. But, 1 RB, 1 TE, and 3 WR means that you have the same 11 players doing many of the same things over and over again. Conversely, I feel that Garrett tries to get 15 or 16 players in the game plan and tries to do it in many, many different ways. I think Garrett has many great ideas and I do think he is a very bright mind. But, I do wonder if there are too many toys in the toy box, and maybe he should identify the 11-13 players who he feels are the most important and just run the offense for them. Perhaps that would enhance the crispness of those groupings and show with a more efficient offense overall. It may cost Tashard Choice, Kevin Ogletree, Sam Hurd, Deon Anderson, and Martellus Bennett some snaps - this is not little league, so I cannot promise everyone playing time. But, If my best players are Felix Jones, Jason Witten, Miles Austin, and Dez Bryant (Marion Barber and Roy Williams, too) then I need to base my offense primarily around them.

2) - Welcome back #63 and #75 - It is not going to suddenly turn the Cowboys offensive line into Vince Lombardi's line, but it should really help for everyone to retake their positions. Kosier is very valuable as a capable interior lineman who does well in space. Colombo brings ability as a Right Tackle, but I also think he brings his attitude which at time sets the tone for the offensive line. He is ready for a street fight, and that is something that this group can sometimes use. But it is all predicated on him being right. Last year, he returned and we found out the hard way that his health was not helping him do his job against Ray Edwards. But, if he is right, they will be so much better than they are with Alex Barron. Rest assured, the Bears will be challenging Colombo's health very early with some determined edge rushing. By the way, I have been curious about this "leg whip" story between Colombo and Tommie Harris. So, we were able to find the video Here thanks to our reader AP.

3) - The Felix Experiment - This may relate back more to Objective #1, but the Cowboys need to figure out how to utilize Felix Jones properly. I suspect that the idea is to find his inner Reggie Bush and to use him all over the field to find match-up issues in the open field. He was drafted in 2008 (just ahead of Rashard Mendenhall and Chris Johnson) and the idea was to have a very dynamic playmaker. He has made many big time plays, but because of his suspect health, they don't believe they can give him the traditional tail-back work load. So, now, they are trying to use him out in the slot periodically (as we saw in the final drive of the Washington game) but in order for that to work they have to demonstrate that they will throw him the ball past the line of scrimmage. If the entire plan with Felix is to throw a quick out to him or to just use him as a decoy, they will never create the issues that they hope to stress and stretch the defense.

4) - Test that Secondary - The Bears have had quite the revolving door in their secondary since their Super Bowl in 2006, and the Cowboys have a group of receivers that make you pick your poison if you can protect your QB. I have to admit I was quite impressed with how NFL-ready Dez Bryant appeared after missing all of preseason. He still needs work on his hot route recognition, but that is an issue for some veterans in this league as well. But, if Dez is what we think he is, and the Cowboys already have Austin and Witten demanding safety support, then I have little doubt that the Cowboys aerial attack is going to be formidable all season. But remember, it is all predicated on getting your QB protected. With Julius Peppers, Tommie Harris, and Mario Williams all on the menu in the next 9 days, we are about to find out.

ON DEFENSE: The big storyline in Chicago this winter was that they needed someone to come in and fix the offense that Jay Cutler struggled mightily in 2009. Enter passing guru Mike Martz. Since his work with the "greatest show on turf" and the Rams trips to the 1999 and 2001 Super Bowls, Martz has been hired repeatedly to show NFL offenses how to move on down the field.

And there is little evidence to argue with his ability to move the chains with his 3 and 4 WR spread offense which uses a ton of "11" personnel to make every defensive back demonstrate that he can cover. In Cutler's debut under Martz, Jay passed for 372 yards and the Bears offense did dominate much of the week 1 battle against the Lions.

Of course, not all is rosy when it comes to Martz. As great as his offenses are at completing passes, they all struggle in the Red Zone. Look at his teams in the last 6 seasons - notice how great their passing offense is and how mediocre they become in the Red Zone.

MIKE MARTZ OFFENSE

Year/TeamPass OffenseOverall OffenseRed Zone Offense
2003/StL3rd9th15th
2004/StL5th6th14th
2005/StL4th9th14th
2006/Detroit7th22nd30th
2007/Detroit9th19th18th
2008/SF13th23rd18th

HTML Tables



The obvious conclusion is similar to that of many "spread" offenses in all levels of football. The closer you get to the goal-line, the tighter things get. In the red zone, safeties aren't worried about being beat over the top and it is way more difficult to find openings. Also, without the aid of a determined running attack all afternoon, it is difficult to just decide to run the ball when it is 3rd and Goal. And as we know in Dallas, all the yards in the world don't mean anything if they aren't resulting in points.

The odd thing? The Bears were 27th in the red zone last season. And to fix that problem, they went to find a coach who traditionally finds scoring somewhat difficult. Hmmm.

DEFENSIVE OBJECTIVES:

1) - Jay Cutler Must Be Hit - In 2009, no QB was hurried as much as Cutler. And, in 2009, nobody threw more interceptions that Culter's 26. In fact, nobody else in the league threw more than 20. Amazing, right? Well, there surely is a connection. Now, as we discuss the Cowboys defense, everybody has said that they played well enough to win on Sunday Night, and they surely did. But, I need that Cowboys pass rush to be much, much better than it was against the Redskins. DeMarcus Ware had a very impressive evening against Trent Williams, but other than his 1 sack, the Cowboys only totaled 3 QB Hits against McNabb. Anthony Spencer was relatively quiet on the other flank. I remember that in 2009, the Cowboys pass rush started very slowly with 0 sacks in the first 2 games, so maybe they just get out of the gates a step slow. But, if the calling card is pressure for this defense, and if you are playing an offensive line that is well below average, then I expect to see a sustained and powerful pass rush on Sunday at noon. Lots of pressure will turn into big plays.

2) - Watch the Screens - The Bears showed last week that they were very proficient at the screen pass from a number of different angles. My fellow football nerd, TC Fleming has written a fine summary of how they do what they do that I think you should check out. Here is just a taste: They are plays that take advantage of the defense overplaying one aspect of the game, thereby discouraging the defense from relying on that aspect. The screen lets pass rushers get near the quarterback before the quarterback flips the ball to the space the pass rushers just vacated. In order to defend the screen, pass rushers have to be patient and stay aware of potential screens. That prevents them from focusing entirely on attacking the quarterback. However, screens lose their effectiveness if the defense can quickly recognize that the play is a screen. A defender is nearly always assigned to the player who is supposed to catch the screen. On a screen pass, one of the offenisve lineman will allow his pass rusher to run himself out of the play as that lineman goes block for the man catching the screen pass. If all of the defenders know that's coming, it's fairly easy to avoid letting it happen that way. Further, if the defenders feel comfortable that they know when the screen is coming, it negates some of the pass-rush-slowing effect the screen game is supposed to have. So in addition to just throwing screens, an offense has to throw well-hidden screens.



3) - Catch Those Picks - If we know anything about Cutler, it is that he a) will try to fit the ball in tight spots and b) has accuracy issues. So, can you catch the ball in the secondary? With a reputation of not being able to make a play, it would sure be nice to get the offense a short field for a change. I hate to harp on this every week, but you cannot expect your offense to march 75 yards routinely for TDs. Don't be afraid to get them the ball in "plus" territory this week.

4) - Expect Devin Hester to Be Featured - This week in Chicago there has been plenty of discussion about the comments of Jay Cutler when he was asked why he threw 1 ball to Devin Hester against the Lions: "If Devin would have gotten open I would have thrown him the ball,'' Cutler said without hesitation. Wow. I guess Cutler doesn't worry about being political. But, we also know how this league works. If you have a player with skills that nobody else on your offense has, you figure out ways to make the defense respect him. The only way the Cowboys worry about Hester is if it appears he is a real threat. He is certainly not the terror he was in 2006 as a return man, but he is still quite dangerous if they can get him loose in the secondary. Alan Ball was not pressured much last week with the Redskins receiving group. And this may be the 2nd straight week the Cowboys play a team without a true #1 WR, but expect an effort to throw the ball down the field repeatedly. And, with this Cutler/Hester storyline, I would not be shocked to see 7 or 8 balls heading for the Hurricane speedster.


Summary

I believe the Cowboys are the better team on both sides of the ball. I also believe the urgency that they feel knowing that Houston is next going into the bye week. Most every projection is predicated on the idea that Marc Colombo is healthy to help protect Tony Romo, but with what should be a very winnable match-up between the Cowboys front 7 and the Bears sub-par offensive line, I feel the Cowboys should be able to get to 1-1.


Cowboys 27, Bears 17

Thursday, September 16, 2010

The Football Laundromat: Chicago Bears Edition

Hi there, readers. TC Fleming here. Each week I think it'd be nice to watch the Cowboys' upcoming opponents' previous week's game and target a specific wrinkle in that team's offense as something to watch for when they play the Cowboys.

The Bears are one of the worst pass-protecting teams in football. Their right tackle couldn't hold down the left guard spot last year. The right guard is a second-year player thought of so highly coming out of college that he fell to the seventh round. The left tackle is a former first-round pick who in his first two years couldn't beat out the indomitable John St. Clair and a nearly-retired, definitely done Orlando Pace for the left tackle job. And their best lineman, Olin Kreutz, ended his string of six straight Pro Bowl selections a full four seasons ago. The first job of any coordinator overseeing this offense is to find ways to distract from the fact their line cannot block.

The obvious, bread-and-butter way to do this is via the screen pass. While it still requires the linemen to do blocking, they are now taking on linebackers and defensive backs rather than defensive ends and tackles. It's just really tough to design a play where your linemen do no blocking whatsoever, so this is the best they could do.

Special Teams and EMails!

http://cowboysblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2010/09/bob-sturm-an-analysis-of-the-c.html

One cool thing about doing this blog is that I can launch research projects simply because I think it might be of interest to the most serious of Cowboys fan. It is time consuming, but when watching a Wednesday Night Rangers game, I like to have a side research project.

I wanted to look at the Special Teams to open the season and check the 4 most crucial groups and see where the overlap is and see what type of player they put on each team.

It is commonly thought throughout the league that special teams are usually the most terrifying to coaching staffs in September. The reasons are obvious if you think about it:

1) - The Special Teams are generally comprised of young players at the bottom of your roster.
2) - These young players were usually such good players at their Universities that they seldom ran special teams there.
3) - There is no way to replicate "game conditions" at training camp.

So, with a lot of help from my DVR, my friend Doug, and my notebook, I tried to put together a chart that would show who was running with what unit. Keep in mind that this is quite unofficial as nobody keeps track of this officially. As a brief aside, isn't that amazing? Every stat in the world is kept in every sport by now, but you are telling me that this shouldn't be somewhere in the game book? The NHL keeps record of every player on the ice for each second. They can break down the chaos of a 60 minute hockey game by each player for each second, and the NFL cannot track which players play on the coverage units? This needs to change.

Anyway, below, you will see that the 4 squads have 6 players in common: Sean Lee (Rookie), Akwasi Owusu-Ansah (Rookie), Danny McCray (Rookie), Victor Butler (2nd year), Michael Hamlin (2nd year), and Sam Hurd (5th year). When you consider that Michael Hamlin played no games his rookie year, you see why the coaches fear special teams in September.


KickoffKickoff ReturnPuntPunt Return
17-Hurd17-Hurd17-Hurd17-Hurd
27-Owusu-Ansah27-Owusu-Ansah27-Owusu-Ansahl27-Owusu-Ansah
36-Hamlin36-Hamlin36-Hamlin36-Hamlin
40-McCray40-McCray40-McCray40-McCray
50-Lee50-Lee50-Lee50-Lee
57-Butler57-Butler57-Butler57-Butler
18-Buehler58-JWilliams58-JWilliams58-JWilliams
34-Anderson34-Anderson34-Anderson88-Bryant
43-Sensabaugh44-Gronkowski44-Gronkowski44-Gronkowski
85-Ogletree23-Choice91-Ladoucer23-Choice
32-Scandrick67-Costa1-McBriar32-Scandrick

HTML Tables



Of slightly less interest to most of you will be this chart below that will track through the season the Cowboys game-day inactives. 53 players on your roster, but only 45 can dress for the game; 46 if you count the 3rd emergency QB. The 7 spots for inactives generally becomes a place to hide your injured players as the season goes on, but I like to have this as a reference tool to see how many players the Cowboys take to the game at each position. The above chart of special team players and the below chart of inactives are closely related. On Saturday, the coaches will meet and discuss who they need to dress to fill those very important special teams and spots on your roster. You have to plan as if a player like DeMarcus Ware or Doug Free gets hurt on the 1st play of the game. Then, how are we going to handle that? A staff must plan for all scenarios, so being short at a position is their worst nightmare.

Cowboys Inactives

Week12345678 (3rd QB)
Wk 1 @ WashB WilliamsK WilliamsB ChurchS YoungK KosierM ColomboS LissemoreS McGee

HTML Tables



-----------------------

OK, let's answer some email:

Mr. Sturm;

I truly enjoyed your article regarding "Decoding Jason Garrett's Offense." However, I have one very important question. Do you think that it is possible that you are providing TOO MUCH information that could benefit opposing teams? I know that sounds ridiculous considering that most coaches get paid enormous sums of money to analyze opposition to degrees of minutae that would make your article seem like a comic book, but I know for a fact that many coaches at the professional level do not truly know their opponents. Either because their information base is too limited, or because experiences skew the results, or simply because they cannot put the proverbial "two plus two equals four" they simply do not know. Believe me, as an amateur I have personal experience in revealing details to coaches of oppositional teams that I thought was blatantly obvious (and was shocked to realize that the coaches did not know such detail.)

Additionally, I am not certain that this team is as talented as the 1992, 1993 teams that could give away most of their plays to the opponents and still execute them with amazing success. (I hope that I am wrong on that part.) But I am worried that Dallas Cowboys opponents will glean more from your very professional analysis than you believe and thus aiding them in stopping (and Heaven forbid DEFEATING) my favorite team. Please consider such as you move forward in your articles… please.

Sincerely,

John


----

John, I am flattered that you like what we do, but I would promise you with absolute certainty that while this material that we are doing may enlighten football fans, it is not 1% of information an opponent has when entering a game. It would be like an opposing army getting information that Fort Bragg is in North Carolina to help them take on the Allies in North Africa. Yes, it is information, but it isn't going to help them.

NFL Coaching Staffs are so advanced in their scouting and preparation that it would absolutely blow your mind. Yes, they do track personnel packages just like we do. Yes, they do look for run/pass tendencies, just like we do. But, from there, they go about 1,000 miles further down the road by things so advanced that they would be speaking some alien language to most of us.

So, while I know for a fact that some of the Cowboys brain trust is intrigued and amused at this project, I don't feel like they think we are giving away any secrets. As one of them said, there are no secrets in the NFL.

Bob


---------------------------

Hey Bob,

I think you do the best job of ANYONE in the area in breaking down games, especially on the offensive side of the ball. I’m sure you have blogged away on Cowboy points today, and will most certainly get into it on the show today. Ohhh, how I long for a Jason Garrett roast today. I know you have that ready to go…

Bob, I realize you get a ton of Cowboy related email, and you’re not soliciting P-1 opinion. Still, I must get some things off my chest. If you choose to delete this upon reading, I completely understand. Purpose served, regardless. Must…. Vent….

Sooooo we open with a fairly crisp drive which stalls – stalls because Red Genius decides it’s time to unveil the horizontal passing hour. Twice to a rookie who hasn’t taken a snap in live action as a pro and another to the Troy Hambrick of wideouts, Roy Williams. Who is Roy Williams going to elude in that situation? Your Bill Cartwright theory validated. Punt.

After three first downs, Dallas’ second drive nearly stalls when another bubble screen goes for a loss. Washington is flagged for unnecessary roughness, so the drive continues. Dallas moves to the Redskin twelve. Out rolls the Marion Barber option pass. Another lateral pass which results in OPI… drive ends on a missed FG.

I must stop there. You know how it went. Too many toys? Jason Garrett’s uncontrollable itch to tinker continues. Last year, you correctly pointed out their most effective formations, and how JG insists upon abandoning what should be his bread and butter, particularly in the red zone.

Why are they so dead set on Bryant being the punt returner? Again, maybe I am crazy here… but I do not recall the kid fielding a single punt in a game this August. Granted, just about all of the punts were difficult to field. I would take issue with the punt right before the half.

Prior to the disaster to end the first half, Washington punted from deep in their own territory. I believe the ball fell around midfield. I haven’t looked at it since it happened, so it is possible I am mistaken, but shouldn’t that punt be fielded on the fly… fair catch? I think we lost 18 yards there.

To revisit…. I know the best runner in Tennessee is Chris Johnson and he will get his touches. I understand the best runner in Atlanta is Michael Turner and he will get his. The top running back in Pittsburgh is Mendenhall. He is going to get work each and every week. I’m not sure if this is Garrett is running the Mike Martz attack, and he never got the memo that running backs are indeed on the field of play OR if this is a higher power insisting Marion Barber be so involved. Whatever.

The one word that comes to mind when describing the Cowboy offense: inefficient. Best runner, best receiver… doesn’t matter. The quality of player doesn’t necessarily determine the pecking order here. We have agendas everywhere. Throw to him, keep his head in it. Give him the rock, we don’t want him upset. Certainly NOT football first.

I cannot help but think what #84 could have done underneath for Tony Romo last night… or fielding punts. Trade the second most effective wideout on the roster a week before the season, HOPING two unprovens will step up. Once again, not even proven in exhibition games, these two kids.

I have so much more, but there isn’t enough time right now, sir. This club just looks terribly mismanaged, completely unprepared. I wouldn’t be so alarmed this early except for the fact Washington has the look of a really bad football team. And we all know what the rest of the schedule brings. Now, the Chicago Bears become a must-win game. Imagine it. Week two, must-win.

Maybe I am crazy. Talk to you later, Bob.

Scott S.
P1, Dallas

---------

Scott,

I hear you. There is no shortage of people wondering about the efficiency of the Cowboys offense. Does Jason Garrett have too many toys and is it too complicated to make sure he uses them all?

I do think in fairness to him, we should consider that the Cowboys have had a very good offense the last few years, and he has helped Tony Romo to develop into a near-star QB. We forget these things during a week after a Cowboys loss.

It has to get better than Week 1, but I am confident that it will - especially when he doesn't have to babysit his Offensive Line. That is why everybody should be hoping that Marc Colombo is actually right this time.

There are two numbers I want to watch closely on the offense this season. 1) How often does Witten stay in/go out. and 2) How many snaps do each of his 3 RBs get?

Well, here is your answer to the RB Question for this week:

TOTAL SNAPS FOR COWBOYS RBs

Half24-Barber28-Jones23-Choice
1st16128
2nd12165
Total282813

HTML Tables



A couple notes here. There were 5 plays where there were no RBs on the field. Of Choice's 13 snaps, 11 were in the 3rd Down offense, and the other 2 were the WC22 play (Wildcat) and the 31 play where all 3 RBs were out there.

And then there was the newest wrinkle to the Jason Garrett offense that I saw in the opener: Felix Jones was the back for the entire final drive (aside from the last play which was Barber). That job was Tashard's for most of last year, and the reason Felix is appealing is that they lined him up in the slot several times as a WR. Yes, he is their version of Reggie Bush and Percy Harvin. Let's see if they can pull it off.

That new idea means more snaps for Felix Jones, but not too many more carries.

-------------------------------

Cowboys just ran an S11, but both Felix Jones was lined up on the outside as a WR.

Technically, that's an S11, but shouldn't it be a S01?

Mike

-----------

Mike

I still call it S11, but in general, no. The reason is because formation does not dictate defensive personnel. They have to declare which 11 defenders are on the field by the subs, then they deploy based on how the offense deploys. This is important, but a sub-category of each personnel group.

Let me explain better as Mike is charting games by personnel package - something more of you might be interested in doing. In fact, I highly recommend you buy Pat Kirwan's new book that explains this and many more football strategy items in simple and wonderful detail.

Anyway, the Cowboys have a few players that each team that plays them will have to define. The more football evolves, the more we see that not all Running Backs are Running Backs. Not all Wide Receivers are Wide Receivers. Heck, not all Quarterbacks can be treated as just Quarterbacks. You cannot say we will cover all opposing RBs with our Linebackers, because what happens when that is Felix Jones? Marion Barber, maybe. But, Felix will run right by him. Then we have to have a safety on him - maybe even a cornerback.

So, I define him as a RB, but actual NFL teams have to decide amongst their coaches how they will do it.

But, to the greater question of why we track personnel groups, we should know the following:

Personnel packages dictate defensive personnel: After a play ends, the defensive coaches are watching the offensive sideline to see who is being put on the field. They see and then send out the appropriate counter package of their own. But, once both teams are in the huddle, the defense waits to see what formation the offense deploys in.

Once a formation is deployed, now the defensive players are on their own. The coaches can yell instructions, but in a loud stadium, it will be up to the 11 players on the field to recall what they have discussed all week for each scenario. Especially with pre-snap motion, there is just no time for much communication from the sideline. It is all on the field from the Middle Line Backer and the safeties calling out coverages that change up until the ball is snapped.

So, in summary: Personnel packages are on the coaches. But, if Felix Jones starts behind Romo and then goes in motion out to a WR spot near the sideline, then the defensive players better know from their work on Wednesday and Thursday what the appropriate adjustments will be. If they don't, then they will look unprepared and poorly coached.

Tomorrow: We Game Plan for the Chicago Bears.

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

EPL Fun Bag #6


Finally, we are all back and in place for another EPL Fun bag!

This doesn't often happen, but one of my very, very, super, duper favorite players of all time is in Frisco Thursday night. You have to come see FC Dallas play my main man, Thierry Henry.

Is he as good as he was in 2001 when he was amazing the world at Arsenal? No. But, he is still better than anyone you have ever seen in person, most likely. And if this youtube cut below doesn't prove he is awesome, then you didn't watch it.

By the way, it should be noted that FC Dallas is on maybe the best roll they have had in Franchise History. They are 10-2-11 and are unbeaten in 14 straight. Their last loss was in May. So, this is not only a great chance to see a stud of world soccer history, but also the possibility of a great match, too. FCD might be for real this season.



And to prove he still has it, here is the goal he scored Saturday . Sweet.

It is worth it. And it is Thursday at 8pm. GO!!!

-----------------------

With football returning, I know your time for soccer might not be at the same level it was in August, but I would encourage you to watch the best soccer show on television which is the "Premier League Review Show" which is on Fox Soccer Channel every Sunday in Brilliant HD. It is a chance to see all of the best moments of the weekend, and you don't have to worry about watching 4 full matches in the middle of your college football season.

On the other hand, if you hate college football - watching 4 matches may be quite enjoyable.

OK, let's check out Round 4 (Weekend 4 you might call it) of the 38 Round EPL Season.

* Only 2 road teams won a match this weekend. There is no doubt this is one of the tougher things about the English League (or any level of big time soccer). Winning road games is just too difficult it seems, and only Chelsea and Blackpool were able to get it done over the weekend.

* Blackpool remains the darling of the EPL, as a newly promoted side after a 40 year lay-off from the top flight, they sit in 4th place in the table and have 2 very impressive road victories already. The win this weekend at St James Park is both stunning for them and causes us great concern about whether Newcastle will be able to stay up this season.

* Manchester United had something happen that hasn't happened in 10 years. They blew a 2 goal lead. And not only did they blow a 2 goal lead, but they blew a 2 goal lead during stoppage time. I was watching this match as they played at Goodison Park against Everton, and I love watching United play as I always hope to be watching when something goes terribly wrong for them. Sorry, but I never have liked them. And before you email, allow me to admit ahead of your note that yes, I am jealous. They win everything all of the time. 1992–93, 1993–94, 1995–96, 1996–97, 1998–99, 1999–2000, 2000–01, 2002–03, 2006–07, 2007–08, 2008–09 would summarize their titles in the last few decades, so, forgive my jealousy.

ANYWAY, United is dealing with similar massive debt as Liverpool is, and while it is not quite as dire, we are seeing the overall quality of their squad eroding. They sold Cristiano Ronaldo last summer, and never really replaced him with much. Then this summer, they were very quiet. And it appears they have very few match winners in the squad these days.

Which leads us to the video below: Everton with amazing goals in stoppage time to earn a draw. And then, the whistle blows on Fergie time as Everton is going for the winner. I will explain Fergie time in a future episode. Check the highlights.



The above implosion of United dropped 2 more points that should not have been. Add that to the two dropped points at Fulham that should not have been and Manchester United is already dangerously close to the unnecessary dropped points tally for the season. You see, you already plan to drop some points in matches against Arsenal, Chelsea, Manchester City, and maybe even Liverpool (like the NFC East, it is best to assume a split, or even 2 draws - which totals 4 more dropped points) so when you start looking at that then you understand why there can't be many of these moments and still stay close to Chelsea.

Chelsea has played 4, won 4 - and although their opponents have not been that strong, they have destroyed pretty much all comers.



The above video is Arsenal football. People often ask me about styles of teams and what each team tries to be. Well, most don't have defined styles from year to year. But Arsenal does. And above, you will see 25 passes in a row that leads to a goal. It is almost like they are mocking poor Bolton. Such skill. And keep in mind half of their squad is out with injuries, which is another stereotype of Arsenal - that their beautiful players are also made of glass.

Here is this weekend's slate - ALL TIMES EASTERN!


Saturday, September 18:
7:45am: Stoke City v West Ham United, ESPN2
10am: Tottenham v Wolves, Fox Soccer Channel
10am: Everton v Newcastle, Fox Soccer Plus
10am: Blackburn v Fulham, FoxSoccer.tv (Fox Soccer Channel at 5pm)
10am: Aston Villa v Bolton, FoxSoccer.tv (Fox Soccer Plus at 6pm)
10am: West Bromwich Albion v Birmingham, FoxSoccer.tv (Fox Soccer Plus on Sunday at 12:30pm)
12:30pm: Sunderland v Arsenal, Fox Soccer Channel

Sunday, September 19:
8:30am: Manchester United v Liverpool, Fox Soccer Plus
11am: Chelsea v Blackpool, Fox Soccer Channel


Yes, only a few weeks since Liverpool's last humiliation in Manchester, we have to go back. This time, United will attempt to light LFC up like a Christmas tree, and I wouldn't bet against it.

-----------------------------------
And, now a speed round of questions from Twitter:

zags_12 do you think Fulham will be competitive this year since they are off to a good start. Or will they flame out?

Me: I think Fulham will be top half of the league. But the Zumora injury kills them. They will scratch and claw, but 8th or 10th is about the best they can do.

DGE9901 will Clint dempesy ever move up too a bigger club?

Me: I need Deuce to hold down a spot in the starting 11 there before we send him to a bigger club. I need my USA boys playing all of the time and not riding the bench in some outlying outpost. Do you hear me Jozy?

Seth_Crosland this is a stupid question, but is the home field advantage in the epl greater than it is in the NFL?

Me: Interesting. I think it is very similar. The problem is that many teams play for draws on the road. With 11 men behind the ball as they say. They are not trying to score - but rather trying to prevent being scored upon. Which can make for boring football.

buccophan Man U, looked horrible, esp Rooney against the Rangers. Should Sir Alex be worried?

Me: Sir Alex is in this whole thing for 2 reasons: EPL Trophy and Champions League Trophy. And yes, from that perspective, eh should be quite worried.

1310SpareP1 Ruud van nisterooj or Henry overall in their primes? Who's better

Me: I love Ruud. He was awesome for United 6 or 7 seasons back. A true post-up Power Forward, but Henry was a stinking genius. Big, Strong, Fast, Creative, and had the ability to score the biggest goals at big times. Henry.

---------------------

EPL newbie, following MCFC. Loving it so far, and really enjoy your EPL funbags. Hope you can find the time to keep doing it! Could you touch on styles? I hear Arsenal plays an “open, attacking”, fun to play style, while I have read in some places that Mancini is conservative and his style may not fit the talent that has been assembled at Eastlands. I know there are different alignments, the 4-4-2, and the 4-3-2-1, etc., but don’t really understand the strategy behind them. Could you give some tips for what to watch to understand an aggressive vs a conservative style?

Thanks,
Rory

Rory, I appreciate your kind words. But, when it comes to tactics in soccer, I feel like I am not as knowledgable as I would love to be, and not able to dedicate my time to it to get there. I can now see aggressive and passive, but knowing the formation styles is just not my gift.

But, I have found an awesome website that breaks it down. I read them constantly, and it makes my brain bigger. It is Zonal Marking.net . Bookmark it and enjoy. It is really quite awesome.

K, Bye!

Week 1 - Targets and Sacks

This summary of all targets and sacks for the offense is a companion piece each week to the Tuesday study . Hopefully, a little more information will assist us in picking through the rubble of the 13-7 loss to Washington.

Part of tracking the offensive production is keeping track of where Tony Romo is going with the football. In week 1, these numbers will fall victim to sample size, but over the course of the season they will begin to tell a story. I have added Tony Romo's passer rating to each guy to help us see who is worth the money and who is not. If you are curious, here are the 2009 numbers to consider.

Dez Bryant with the most targets? Jason Witten just 3 for 8? It is early. But, it is what it is.


Target Distribution:

Targets - Week 1 at Washington
/tr>
NameTargetsCatchesYardsFD/TD/INTQB Rating
Austin11101467/1/0149.1
Bryant128564/0/077.1
Witten83271/0/047.3
Williams73211/0/050.2
Jones22261/0/0118.7
Barber3210/0/070
Choice22-20/0/079.3
Bennett2170/0/058.3
Ogletree1000/0/00
Totals483128214/1/089.1

Table Tutorial



This is likely the portion of the exercise where we point out that Miles Austin is amazing. And Tony Romo has no problem knowing where Austin is going to be and connecting with him.

Now, the same exercise on the money down. When they must get a big catch to move the chains, where do they go? Again, small sample after 1 week, but here they are.

3RD/4TH Down Targets - Week1 at Washington
NameTargetsCatchesYardsFD/TDQB Rating
Austin11301/0/0118.7
Bryant42201/0/064.4
Williams21101/0/064.6
Witten31130/0/0118.7
Totals105733/0/074.1

Table Tutorial



I also started to note his targets based on which defensive back he was "going after". Amazingly, my notes indicate that he was clearly looking for #23 - DeAngelo Hall on Sunday night. That could be considered all the more ironic since it was #23 who scored one of the more gutting Touchdowns that we can remember around here.

This is extremely unofficial and experimental. Obviously, there are a number of occasions where a defense is in a loose zone or passes off a receiver from one defender to the next. So, I note on each particular play which DB is appearing to be in coverage, and if there is not one - this happens plenty - then I do not mark down on any man's ledger. But, as you saw in the Monday Night game when Joe Flacco was chasing Kyle Wilson around the field, this often determines a QBs target as much as the receiver. A QB is looking for a match-up he likes.


Targeted DBTimes
23 - DeAngelo Hall14
22 - Carlos Rogers4
30 - LaRon Landry4
31 - Phillip Buchanon3
37 - Reed Doughty2

HTML Tables



So, was Romo going after Hall? It appears so. Also, we should point out that Hall was the LCB (QB's right) which is all the more likely side for right-handed QBs to throw - especially if they are trying to get the ball out quickly.

SACKS

Only 1 sack against on Sunday night, but that was more a product of play-calling than great pass protection. Further, 3 Holding calls on your RT do not count as sacks against, but they are certainly drive-killers and game-losers. Anyway, we examine each sack during the season (I wonder if we should also look at holding calls) and try to determine who is at fault. Usually, this requires a certain degree of guessing, but since Jason Garrett won't write this column nor will he allow me into their meetings, we can never be absolutely sure of who was supposed to do what. Keep that in mind, please.


Sack #1 - 2Q - Play# 21 - 12 - 2/10/45 - McIntosh Sack




What Happened: 12 Personnel, and this is the beauty of the 3-4 defense. As we see in Dallas, you have to account for the possibility that 7 different men could rush (not all at the same time) and you have to determine who might be coming and plan for all possible scenarios. With 2 TEs, the Redskins are mindful of the possibility that this could be a run that is heavily blocked to the right with Martellus next to Barron. The Cowboys OL is preparing to pass protect and Free is ready for Orakpo. Orakpo drops with Witten into coverage, so Free rolls down to Haynesworth. Haynesworth is carrying out a basic 3-4 idea that if you run at the LT, then the middle LB can shoot the A-Gap and sometimes have a free run at the QB. Holland looks like he is not quite sure who to get, but, Gurode is ready for the A-Gap blitz from 52 McIntosh. Trouble is, he cannot stay squared in front of him, and ends up being overpowered and gives up the sack. It is possible that Holland will lose a grade in the coaching room, but I give this to Andre because he was there, and he was beaten. He also committed a holding penalty here that was declined.

----------------------------------------------------
The Rankings for the season in Sacks Allowed among the OL: Gurode 1

Sack #Down/DistPersonnelSackerBlame
1/12/10/D4512McIntoshGurode

HTML Tables



Here are the sack reports from 2009.

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Decoding Garrett '10 - Week 1

http://cowboysblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2010/09/bob-sturm-decoding-cowboys-off.html



For those of you new to this - and that would be most of the DMN readers - this is a project to attempt to understand what the Cowboys offensive brain-trust designed and attempted to perform against the opponent on a week-to-week basis. We look at the data, piece by piece until we can figure out what they were trying to do - and more importantly, how well it worked.

At first glance, the Cowboys had what would be termed a normal offensive game. 377 yards in the game is a slightly below-average production number for Dallas (399 per game in '09), but it would put the team on pace for another 6,000 yard season. 6 teams in the NFL had 6,000 yards in 2009: New Orleans, Dallas, New England, Houston, Minnesota, and Green Bay. The Average NFL team had 335 yards per game in 2009, and the average playoff team rolled out 363 yards per game.

However, yards per play was way down (6.26 in '09) with only 5.31 yards per play. 1 yard under a team's average on every play is significant.

And then the biggest number of all that jumps off the page is 7 points. Bill Parcells would tell the media in his occasionally informative press conference mode that a team needs to score 7 points for every 100 yards of offense for it to feel it had an efficient day. This assumes normal average starting field position and normal "hidden yardage" production from special teams, but when you are close to 400 yards, you cannot be sitting on 7 points. Nowhere near enough bang for your buck.

Against the Redskins, the Cowboys were without 2 starting offensive linemen. It was clear that all week, Jason Garrett planned to protect them, because he knew with a normal Cowboys game-plan, it might be difficult to protect them from being exposed to a few very capable pass rushers.

Every week, coaches sit in a film room and evaluate what they have and what their opponent has. This game plan often dictates just about everything you see in the first half of a game. So, from a play-calling stand point, you can see that the Cowboys did not have a whole lot of early faith in anything but the extremely quick, short passing game. Like we expected, Tony Romo was going to have to get the ball and get it out to the perimeter quickly. If it worked, then the Redskins would have to respect the flanks - which, of course, would diminish the amount of players that they could send on blitzes.

Here is what they did on 1st Down throughout the game: 34 1st Down Plays: 24 Pass/10 Run


Run-Pass22-49
1st Down Run-Pass10-24
2nd Down Avg Distance to Go7.26
2nd Down Run-Pass8-15
3rd Down Avg Distance to Go9.23
3rd Down Run-Pass4-9
3rd Down Conversions5-13, 38%

HTML Tables



I find those totals a bit misleading, because this was not a traditional "sling it around" game plan, but rather, a commitment to quick 3-step drop passing plays that would not ask his line to hold up for more than a few quick seconds. Of course, once the game develops, and you must roll the dice because of the scoreboard and the situation, then you must put Romo back in his normal spot and ask him to hang in there under pressure and allow his men to get down field. This is why you don't see Alex Barron, in particular, exposed until nearly half-time. But, in the 2nd half, the Cowboys had to forget the game-plan and get points, because they were down 10. And that played right into the Redskins defensive schemes. Now, you understand the full impact of that play right before the half.

Here is the breakdown by groupings:

Totals by Personnel Groups:
PackagePlays RunYardsRunPass
113-12-(-1)1-0
1215695-3210-37
217483-124-36
2211708-393-31
31161-60-0
WC22141-40-0
S016360-06-36
S11241132-1122-102
S123320-03-32
Totals7137722-10349-274

Table Tutorial



Totals by Personnel Groups on 3rd/4th Down:
PackagePlays RunYardsRunPass
112-12-(-1)0-0
S011130-01-13
S1111712-119-60
Totals14834-1010-73

Table Tutorial



For a more expanded definition of the Personnel Groups, click here.

I think we see from the above totals that the 2010 Cowboys will be doing plenty of things that utilize the 3WR and 4WR sets that Dez Bryant should allow. 11 personnel is dangerous for any opponent to defend, with Austin, Bryant, Williams, Witten, and a RB, and it forces the opponent to generally go with a nickel defense which should make running more effective. We shall see about that when Kosier and Colombo get back, but for now, we can see that S11 was not nearly productive enough in the passing game with only 4.63 yards per pass. When you are spreading out your defense and throwing out of shotgun, a team must roll up 6 or 7 yards per throw, and the Cowboys just couldn't get on the same page. Again, a lot of this is because they did not have time. But, we already know that.

Now, my favorite part of Decoding Garrett; Looking at particular plays on video and talking through them. We pick 5-6 plays from each week (some good, some bad) and see what we can see:

Video Breakdowns:

Thanks, Brian at DC Fanatic.com .

-----------------------------------------------------
The Play:3Q - Play #40 - S12 - 2/5/22 - Romo beats blitz to Austin for 29



What Happened:This one is beautiful and demonstrates the skill level of the QB. S12, with Bennett lined up on the left sideline, opposite 3 weapons on the right. Witten in tight, Austin in the slot, and Dez up top. At the snap, 30 - Landry blitzes off RT, and Drew Bledsoe would have been toast. But, Romo steps up in the pocket and stays alive to find Austin running across. The Redskins gamble that the blitz will get there, but if it doesn't Austin will be running with Line Backers. 22 - Rogers leaves Bennett and chases Austin down on the play. This is one of two plays where we wonder if a slightly better throw would have resulted in a 78 yard Touchdown rather than a 29 yard gain. I hate to ask the world of Tony, but on this play and the next one, Miles must stop and catch the pass behind him and this allows the defenders to catch him. Another thing to point out is that the Cowboys line Witten up next to Barron - which should give a presnap read of pass protection to the defense, but that is a cat-and-mouse game where if they guess right (and they did) then Romo has a guy who is unaccounted for, because Barron can't worry about Landry when he is trying to block the linebacker.

------------------------------------------------------------

The Play:4Q - Play #69 - S11 - 4/10/43 - Romo to Austin for big +31



What Happened: This may be an example of the Redskins trying to learn a new scheme. They have a very exotic blitz package here on a play that can win the game for them if they can hold up one more time. They want the Cowboys to think they are rushing 3 and dropping 8, but in reality they are rushing 5. But the extra 2, #52 McIntosh and #23 Hall are coming on a delay blitz. Then, everyone behind those 5 must find their man quickly, but confusion allows Miles Austin of all people to run free as #22 Rogers and #31 Buchanon both seem to think they are on Roy Williams on the left flank. The key here is the great recognition of Romo to find the man running free on a play they must convert or the game is over. It takes a busted coverage of the Redskins to make this happen, but there is nothing wrong with that. But, this is a poor throw by Romo (behind him) or it is a likely Touchdown. Romo would want this throw again for sure.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

The Play:2Q - Play #19 - 11 3/1/42 - Barber left for 3




What Happened: I wanted to look at these next 2 plays for a reason. First, 11 personnel, but short yardage running is interesting. Usually, on 3rd and short, the Cowboys run out multiple TEs and get the ground and pound. THe problem with that is that is the Redskins would counter with 8-man fronts on 3rd and short. So, Garrett tries to spread you out with a formation that you better respect for the pass. A triple bunch to the right, but all coverage concerns in "11". Witten comes in motion to balance things out to the left. Then, Barber runs out of this posture. This first time, it works well as Doug Free seems to block the entire left flank on his own, once Witten seals off his man (Orakpo) with a down block in front of Free. 68 - Free looks very capable in space, and it is a nice conversion by the Cowboys.

------------------------------------------

The Play: 4Q - Play #60 - 11 - 3/2/41 - Choice left blown up badly



What Happened: The play above worked well, so later they called it again. It certainly did not work here. People always wonder why the Cowboys don't keep running stuff until the opponent stops it. Well, here we give the Redskins credit for recognizing the exact same idea and blowing it up with sheer numbers. Orakpo sees Witten looking for the seal and decides that Witten is not blocking him. This knocks Free way back in the backfield, and Free cannot do what he did last time. When you look at the same play with 2 different outcomes, you see why coaching football must be so intoxicating. It really is a chess game and each team keeps figuring out what the other is trying to do and they take it away. A pass back to the right here would have caught the Redskins with their pants down as both safeties were sitting a run like Barber had in the 2Q. Witten is a fine blocker, but Orakpo has proven to us he is no joke. So very strong.

------------------------------------------
The Play: 3Q - Play #47 - 22 - 2/4/16 - Barber power right +12



What Happened: This is another play that they ran several times on Sunday Night. "22" personnel, with Bennett and Witten to the right, and a FB in front of the TB. This "22" personnel is something the Cowboys do very, very well. The reason is simple - Witten and Bennett scare teams over the top. I find the fact that Bennett is still a seam concern somewhat confusing, given that he has played 33 games in the NFL and has yet to really make anyone pay for not treating him as a simple blocking TE with the occasional 8 yard curl reception, but it is clear they still fear him for some reason. Anyway, this play has been run dozens of times in the last year. Bennett in motion from the sideline to the LDE. He crashes down here, and then Witten and Anderson grab the LB help to that side. This leaves a 1-on-1 situation between Barber and the DB. 12 easy yards on one of the Cowboys favorite plays. Anytime a team sees "22" personnel come on the field, they are looking for this play. Funny thing about it? They still do not stop it very well. And because of that, the easy extension of this is to find Austin on the weakside with man-to-man after the safeties cheat to it.


------------------------------------------
The Play:3Q - Play #46 - 1/10/O22 - 31 - 3RB Option Right



What Happened: A very rare "31" personnel package, with all 3 RBs out on the field at the same time. The more I watch this replay, the more I am convinced that if Choice pitches it to Felix there is a Touchdown here. MB3 looks like he will get the last man on the flank on the block. Choice keeps it and picks up a nice gain on 1st down (6 yards), but in film study, I think they will see something bigger here. This would also seem to be an imposing idea out of the Wildcat, so we will keep an eye on that. At the start of the play, Austin and Felix are lined up wide giving the Redskins a normal formation read. Then when Felix goes in motion to the backfield, I would imagine the Redskins are all a bit concerned about what was just sprung on them. If nothing else, this is the kind of play that will keep the Chicago Bears coaching staff busy for an hour this week about they can keep enough numbers on the flank to deal with 3 RB running lanes, without leaving the weak-side wide open for a pass to Miles.



------------------------------------------
The Play: 4Q - Play #72 - S11 - 3/10/13 - last play of game



What Happened:And now, the play that made us all crazy. Here is what I wrote yesterday, so let's see if it makes sense with the video: It is the last chance to save this game. The Cowboys just called their final timeout to consider what their best option could be. This throw must go into the end-zone, which, of course, means that the protection scheme must provide Romo and the receivers (Miles Austin, Roy Williams, Jason Witten, and Dez Bryant) a chance to get through their routes and complete the pass. The Redskins, who have been blitzing quite constantly in this final drive, decide to drop 8 into coverage and only rush 3. Free seems to have Carter driven past the pocket. Gurode and Holland double team Vonnie Holiday and have him blocked. Leonard Davis is left with nobody in front of him when Alexander drops into coverage. And, that leaves Orakpo vs Barron yet again. Earlier in the Quarter, on the Cowboys 8th drive, Barron nullified a 12 yard pass to Witten on 3rd and 11 with his holding penalty on Orakpo. It is clear that Orakpo's move to the outside shoulder of Barron is something the Cowboys back-up tackle has no answer to. This has been obvious to those of us at home, so I would like to think that Garrett and his crew are on top of the situation. And yet, at the snap, despite having Barber lined up right behind Barron as if he is going to chip Orakpo at the snap, Barber cuts to the opposite side of Barron (his inside shoulder) and pops out on a useless pass pattern. I say "useless" because Romo is not going to pass it to Barber at the 10 yard line with time expired. Did Barber not chip when he was supposed to? Did Garrett not instruct him to do so with this protection scheme? Both seem unthinkable, but one must be true. Because even though the Redskins just rushed 3 men, Barron had no chance against Orakpo's move to the outside, and Barron puts him in a illegal clothes-line move almost immediately. After watch the replay several dozen times, I am convinced a simple chip from Barber and the Cowboys win this game. But, what I think doesn't matter. What actually happened is that Romo ran for his life and found an opening enough to hit a wide-open Roy Williams in the endzone after he ran a long crossing route on the play. For a split second it appeared to be a magical Dallas moment, until we saw the referee made the call that he had no choice but to make.

I would just add this: After further review, it appears that Barber carried out his assignment. He saw no need to help because RT and RG should be able to handle 1 LB. The problem is that Barron must set up to not be beaten to the outside. If he cheats to the outside and Orakpo shoots inside, then Davis is there to help (and so is Barber). But, Barron was beaten to the outside. I think this must be a scheme issue where they depended on Barron and now spend all week wondering why they were silly enough to depend on Barron. Lesson learned.

We will look at Targets and Sacks in a post coming very soon.

Monday, September 13, 2010

The Morning After: Washington 13, Dallas 7

http://cowboysblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2010/09/bob-sturm-no-reason-to-call-pl.html


The Cowboys and Redskins did battle in Landover, Maryland last night for over 3 hours. During that time, there were 130 offensive plays run between the two teams. Loads and loads of remarkable moments involving dozens of different players. But, in the end, as the game of football often does, most everything seems to cancel each-other out and the outcome of the contest came down to two moments in time. Those catastrophic moments, assuming you were counting on a Dallas victory, will haunt Cowboys' fans for a length of time somewhere between 6 days and decades.

Let's examine each before we fill in the gaps with the other 128 snaps:

1) - :04 left in 2nd Quarter; 1st and 20 from the Dallas 36 yard-line: In a half where Jason Garrett exercised extreme caution with his play-calling so as not to expose his less-than-stellar offensive line, for some reason he threw caution to the wind on this snap that shall live in infamy. The first thing you have to know is that you are down 3 points to a team that doesn't appear capable of scoring much. The next thing you need to know is that you are 64 yards from a Touchdown with only 4 seconds to play. Without a timeout, there is simply no possibility of a pass shorter than 64 yards getting you a even a Field Goal opportunity, as a pass play of 30 yards to the edge of FG range would take all 4 seconds. Given all of these scenarios, and given the fact that the reason you are in 1st and 20 is that Alex Barron has taken the first of his 3 holding penalties on the play right before this moment, this appears to be a play with nearly zero upside. I must include the word "nearly" in that previous statement because "nearly" impossible is how I would have rated the possibility of what actually happened. But it did. In the blink of an eye, the game went from being quite manageable to ridiculous. There was no way Tony Romo could throw a "Hail Mary" because it is barely 2 seconds into the play by the time that Lorenzo Alexander sprints around Left Tackle Doug Free, flushing Romo out of the pocket and toward the line of scrimmage. Over at Right Tackle, Andre Carter is chipped by Tashard Choice to give Alex Barron a chance to stay in front of him. Brian Orakpo is working past Leonard Davis on an inside stunt with Carter and actually flies past Romo in the air as Romo stepped up for a throwing window. By this point in the play, the alarms in Romo's head are going crazy as he is officially running for his life. He knows the play is dead and he pitches the ball to Tashard Choice who has nobody within 5 yards of him. By the time Choice receives the ball, the 4 seconds are already off the clock and everyone expects Choice to be tackled and the teams to head into the locker-room for their intermission. But, then the moment that cannot happen - does. Choice decides to attempt to run over DeAngelo Hall, with Carter and Alexander on the scene for a gang tackle at the 37 yard line. Hall strips the ball from Choice, and the ball rolls right back to him at the 31. From here, Hall has a 3 yard head start on Leonard Davis to the endzone, which is a race he wins by 20 yards. Fed-Ex Field goes bananas and the Cowboys are left pondering the idiocy that they just performed. There is no reason to call the play. There is no excuse for fumbling that ball. Unacceptable on every single level, and the kind of play that gets you beat on the road most times.

2) :03 left in the 4th Quarter; 3rd and 10 from the Washington 13: It is the last chance to save this game. The Cowboys just called their final timeout to consider what their best option could be. This throw must go into the end-zone, which, of course, means that the protection scheme must provide Romo and the receivers (Miles Austin, Roy Williams, Jason Witten, and Dez Bryant) a chance to get through their routes and complete the pass. The Redskins, who have been blitzing quite constantly in this final drive, decide to drop 8 into coverage and only rush 3. Free seems to have Carter driven past the pocket. Gurode and Holland double team Vonnie Holiday and have him blocked. Leonard Davis is left with nobody in front of him when Alexander drops into coverage. And, that leaves Orakpo vs Barron yet again. Earlier in the Quarter, on the Cowboys 8th drive, Barron nullified a 12 yard pass to Witten on 3rd and 11 with his holding penalty on Orakpo. It is clear that Orakpo's move to the outside shoulder of Barron is something the Cowboys back-up tackle has no answer to. This has been obvious to those of us at home, so I would like to think that Garrett and his crew are on top of the situation. And yet, at the snap, despite having Barber lined up right behind Barron as if he is going to chip Orakpo at the snap, Barber cuts to the opposite side of Barron (his inside shoulder) and pops out on a useless pass pattern. I say "useless" because Romo is not going to pass it to Barber at the 10 yard line with time expired. Did Barber not chip when he was supposed to? Did Garrett not instruct him to do so with this protection scheme? Both seem unthinkable, but one must be true. Because even though the Redskins just rushed 3 men, Barron had no chance against Orakpo's move to the outside, and Barron puts him in a illegal clothes-line move almost immediately. After watch the replay several dozen times, I am convinced a simple chip from Barber and the Cowboys win this game. But, what I think doesn't matter. What actually happened is that Romo ran for his life and found an opening enough to hit a wide-open Roy Williams in the endzone after he ran a long crossing route on the play. For a split second it appeared to be a magical Dallas moment, until we saw the referee made the call that he had no choice but to make.

And those two plays are what put the Cowboys to the sword at the hands of their hated foes. Irony drips everywhere on this one, because the Cowboys spent the entire night trying to avoid Alex Barron costing them huge moments, only to shockingly allow him to stand on an island against a man he demonstrated he couldn't block. 130 plays, and if a running back assists a right tackle on play #130, your night goes from defeat to victory. Details, details, details...

We must remember that while it is costly, last night represents exactly 6.25% of the season. 93.75% of the season is ahead, so let's all keep our heads here. Also, many of us expect that most years you can book a 3-3 mark inside your division because nights like these happen. But, wow.

More Random Observations:

* As we said on Friday's Game Plan, the Cowboys are notorious for having extremely poor starting field position. They ranked 30th in the NFL in 2009 for the place where Romo and the offense get to start each drive, which averaged out to their own 27 yard line. Only Oakland and Tennessee were set up in a worse position. This is a product of special teams not being very special and the defense never taking the ball away from the opponent. Well, 10 drives on Sunday night, and the average starting field position of those 10 drives? That's right, their own 27 yard line.

* I certainly am no medical expert. But, I do watch an awful lot of football. And by my count, that is the 3rd time since last September that DeMarcus Ware has been very slow to get up from an apparent neck injury. Now, we can obviously debate the severity of each of these occasions (Tampa Bay, San Diego, and Washington), but we cannot debate that it is the same guy and the same very serious part of the body for a football player. We also cannot debate that he is without question the Cowboys best defensive player of this entire era, and that is why I hope that this disturbing trend stops very quickly. I certainly would not pretend to offer Ware advice about his tackling technique, but last night his head was down and he was not looking at what he was hitting. Scary stuff.

* Dez Bryant's debut would have to be called impressive. He was not perfect by any stretch (as a ball sailed right past his eyeballs on one particular moment where he evidently didn't realize he was the "hot" read) but I never would have expected that he would have 12 balls thrown in his direction. Those quick screens were not fooling anyone, but they did get him involved early, and I don't think it would be a stretch to already assume that the Cowboys are ready to give him the job as #2 man behind Austin. Roy Williams will have his chances this year, but on a big-picture basis, it appears that they have big plans for #88.

* If I am Wade Phillips, I need much more pressure from my defense. Ware did get 1 sack, but beyond that, the Redskins were not overwhelmed at all with the blitzes and pressure schemes of the Cowboys defense. Anthony Spencer was kept quiet most of the night by Jammal Brown, and overall, the Linebackers blitzing through the "A" gaps gave the Redskins interior very little concern. Additionally, As the game went on, Clinton Portis started finding more success and the Redskins were able to accomplish just enough to look dangerous at various moments. That 4th Quarter drive that ended in the long Gano FG consumed tons of valuable seconds that the Cowboys could not afford to lose. While it is difficult placing too much blame on the defense after they held the Redskins to 6 points, I don't want to let them off the hook. They can play much better than that.

* Very odd officiating in that final Redskins drive where they flagged Chris Cooley for illegal motion that nullified a long Portis run because they said he was leaning to the line of scrimmage at the snap. On the very next snap, he did it again - perhaps even more blatantly, and they let it go. And Portis broke off an even longer run.

* Someone may have to explain NBC's Night Vision idea. That was about as pointless a technological advance as I can recall.

* I can't believe that NBC didn't think that they should remind the marginal NFL fan about why Andre Gurode and Albert Haynesworth have such a history. October 1, 2006 was the notable day where they became forever linked when Haynesworth stomped Gurode in one of the more bizarre losses of composure that I can recall. In case your memory doesn't serve you well, Here is the Youtube link for your review. I thought the battle last night was pretty salty while it lasted, but I would also imagine that last night may very well be his last night in Washington. It is guys like him who give all professional athletes a bad name. Very few have that level of sorriness and take a gigantic stack of money but don't feel like that allows anyone to coach them how they see fit. I hope he knows the ramifications of his actions - that while he may get his money - he will never have the respect of most people in the league. Quite a shame for a tremendous athlete.

* On Tuesday, we attempt to deconstruct the play-calling of Jason Garrett, but I know most people don't want to wait. I anticipated a game plan where they would ask Romo to get the ball out quickly. So, when that happens, I would be foolish to seem surprised. But, he is taking a beating today for not calling that game right. Actually, I think he did what had to be done. You will not ground and pound with success with that line you had last night. He did what had to be done. But 3 major errors are why he does need to be critiqued. I wrote at great length at the start of this review what 2 of them are: 1) the play idea at the end of the half. 2) the premise of not giving Barron help on the most important play of the game. and now 3) not nearly enough Felix Jones. I don't think you can have a weapon that dangerous and have huge portions of the game where he is not heard from. The Cowboys have a lot of toys in their toy box on offense. But, they have to know their priorities. Felix Jones must be a priority in his 3rd season. 10 touches is about 5 touches too light for me.

* I don't believe this will be the only time this season that we ponder how good the Cowboys are at kicker. The handling of this entire David Buehler situation is curious. If he was so good, why didn't you give him the job in December when Nick Folk hit the skids? But, if you had concerns about him in December, why did you not have concerns about him in July when you decided that he was your unchallenged kicker? What could he have possibly done between January and July to prove he could make a big time kick in a regular season road game? By the way, a 34-yard FG in the 2nd Quarter of week 1 is hardly a big time kick. And he missed that. Look for this to be a theme for a while here.

* Alan Ball was not a factor in game 1. That is very good, but most teams will have far more aerial plans than Washington.

* Miles Austin is worth every penny. I know we all want things to complain about, but paying an elite receiver fair money is not worth your complaints. He gives opponents fits. Too strong for most corners, too fast for most safeties. He is a fine investment. Don't let bad contracts for Joey Galloway and Roy Williams ruin good contracts for guys who are worth it.

This one will sting a bit. Of your eight road games, this one might be ranked the easiest challenge, and yet it goes in the loss column. Hopefully, help is on the way for the offense with health returning for Marc Colombo and Kyle Kosier. Either way, noon Sunday brings in the very fortunate Chicago Bears for another very important contest.

93.75% to go.